Author:
Carbone Ilma Floriana,Gigli Francesca Maria Paola,Rossi Gabriele,Romagnoli Valentina,Gallicola Benedetta,Sandi Flavia,Esposito Giovanna,Ferrazzi Enrico Mario
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of our study was to assess the possible benefits of Therapeutic Magnetic Resonance (TMR) in the treatment of spontaneous perineal lacerations and episiotomies in the postpartum.
Methods
We performed a prospective, non-pharmacologic, non-profit, monocentric interventional study on women who had a spontaneous laceration and/or an episiotomy at delivery. The TMR device treatment was accepted by 52 women, while 120 women underwent standard care. Patients were visited 1 day postpartum, before starting the treatment; then a follow-up visit was performed at 3 weeks, 5 weeks, and 3 months after delivery. The main endpoint was the time required for complete healing of the laceration and/or the episiotomy. Secondary endpoints were the prevalence of dehiscence, infections, urinary discomfort, urinary leakage, and the quality of restoration of sexual function.
Results
In the treatment group the REEDA score was significantly better both at 3- and 5-weeks postpartum follow-up. At 3 weeks and 5 weeks postpartum, we observed a significantly better outcome in the treatment group for all subjective complaints and perineal complications associated with lacerations and episiotomies. The percentage of patients who scored above the cutoff for sexual dysfunction was significantly better in the treatment group (83.3%) than in the control group (31.8%) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
With this pilot study, we introduced low dose Pulsating Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) as a novel conservative and not pharmacological approach to reduce complications of perineal lesions. Our results demonstrated to significantly improve perineal wound healing and to ameliorate the sexual function in the postpartum.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Milano
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Bassett CaL, Pilla AA, Pawluk RJ (1977) ‘A Non-Operative Salvage of Surgically-Resistant Pseudarthroses and Non-Unions by Pulsing Electromagnetic Fields: A Preliminary Report. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976-2007) 124:128
2. Caliogna L et al (2021) Pulsed electromagnetic fields in bone healing: molecular pathways and clinical applications. Int J Mol Sci 22(14):7403
3. Daish C, Blanchard R, Fox K, Pivonka P, Pirogova E (2018) The application of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) for bone fracture repair: past and perspective findings. Ann Biomed Eng 46(4):525–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-1982-1
4. Gossling HR, Bernstein RA, Abbott J (1992) Treatment of ununited tibial fractures: a comparison of surgery and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF). Orthopedics 15(6):711–719. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19920601-08
5. Hannemann PFW et al (2014) CT scan-evaluated outcome of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of acute scaphoid fractures: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Bone Jt J 96-B(8):1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33767