Satellite design optimization for differential lift and drag applications
-
Published:2024-04-22
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1868-2502
-
Container-title:CEAS Space Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:CEAS Space J
Author:
Marianowski ClaudiaORCID, Traub Constantin, Pfeiffer Marcel, Beyer Julian, Fasoulas Stefanos
Abstract
AbstractUtilizing differential atmospheric forces in the very low earth orbits (VLEO) regime for the control of the relative motion within a satellite formation is a promising option as any thrusting device has significant impact on system design due to the limited weight and size restrictions of small satellites. One possible approach to increase the available accelerations caused by the atmosphere is to reduce the mass of the respective satellites as well as to increase the available surface area. However, satellites of these characteristics suffer from rapid orbital decay and consequently have a reduced service lifetime. Therefore, achieving higher control forces is in contradiction to achieving a minimum orbital decay of the satellites, which currently represents one of the biggest challenges in the VLEO regime. In this article, the geometry of a given reference satellite, a 3UCubeSat, is optimized under the consideration of different surface material properties for differential lift and drag control applications while simultaneously ensuring a sustained VLEO operation. It is worth noting that both the consideration of sustainability as well as the optimization with regard to differential lift are new in literature. It was shown that the advantageous geometries strongly depend on the type of gas–surface interaction and thus, two different final designs, one for each extreme type, are presented. In both cases, improvements in all relevant parameters could be achieved solely via geometry adaptions.
Funder
Universität Stuttgart
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Crisp, N.H., Roberts, P.C.E., Livadiotti, S., Oiko, V.T.A., Edmondson, S., Haigh, S.J., Huyton, C., Sinpetru, L.A., Smith, K.L., Worrall, S.D., Becedas, J., Domínguez, R.M., González, D., Hanessian, V., Mølgaard, A., Nielsen, J., Bisgaard, M., Chan, Y.-A., Fasoulas, S., Herdrich, G.H., Romano, F., Traub, C., Garcia-Almiñana, D., Rodriguez-Donaire, S., Sureda, M., Kataria, D., Outlaw, R., Belkouchi, B., Conte, A., Perez, J.S., Villain, R., Heißerer, B., Schwalber, A.: The benefits of very low earth orbit for earth observation missions. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 117, 100619 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100619 2. D’Amico, S.: Autonomous formation flying in low earth orbit. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology (2010) 3. Leonard, C.L., Hollister, W., Bergmann, E.: Orbital formationkeeping with differential drag. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 12(1), 108–113 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20374 4. Bevilacqua, R., Romano, M.: Rendezvous maneuvers of multiple spacecraft using differential drag under j2 perturbation. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 31(6), 1595–1607 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36362 5. Pérez, D., Bevilacqua, R.: Differential drag spacecraft rendezvous using an adaptive lyapunov control strategy. Acta Astronaut. 83, 196–207 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.09.005
|
|