Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of the Review
Improved forest management is a promising avenue for climate change mitigation. However, we lack synthetic understanding of how different management actions impact aboveground carbon stocks, particularly at scales relevant for designing and implementing forest-based climate solutions. Here, we quantitatively assess and review the impacts of three common practices—application of inorganic NPK fertilizer, interplanting with N-fixing species, and thinning—on aboveground carbon stocks in plantation forests.
Recent Findings
Site-level empirical studies show both positive and negative effects of inorganic fertilization, interplanting, and thinning on aboveground carbon stocks in plantation forests. Recent findings and the results of our analysis suggest that these effects are heavily moderated by factors such as species selection, precipitation, time since practice, soil moisture regime, and previous land use. Interplanting of N-fixing crops initially has no effect on carbon storage in main tree crops, but the effect becomes positive in older stands. Conversely, the application of NPK fertilizers increases aboveground carbon stocks, though the effect lessens with time. Moreover, increases in aboveground carbon stocks may be partially or completely offset by emissions from the application of inorganic fertilizer. Thinning results in a strong reduction of aboveground carbon stocks, though the effect lessens with time.
Summary
Management practices tend to have strong directional effects on aboveground carbon stocks in plantation forests but are moderated by site-specific management, climatic, and edaphic factors. The effect sizes quantified in our meta-analysis can serve as benchmarks for the design and scoping of improved forest management projects as forest-based climate solutions. Overall, management actions can enhance the climate mitigation potential of plantation forests, if performed with sufficient attention to the nuances of local conditions.
Funder
Bezos Earth Fund
Children's Investment Fund Foundation
COmON Foundation
Craig and Susan McCaw Foundation
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
Good Energies Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Forestry
Reference106 articles.
1. IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York. 2022.
2. Cook-Patton SC, Leavitt SM, Gibbs D, et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature. 2020;585:545–50.
3. Cook-Patton SC, Gopalakrishna T, Daigneault A, et al. Lower cost and more feasible options to restore forest cover in the contiguous United States for climate mitigation. One Earth. 2020;3:739–52.
4. Di Sacco A, Hardwick KA, Blakesley D, et al. Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Glob Change Biol. 2021;27:1328–48.
5. Griscom B, Adams J, Ellis P, et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献