A Standards Organization for Open and FAIR Neuroscience: the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility

Author:

Abrams Mathew BirdsallORCID,Bjaalie Jan G.ORCID,Das SamirORCID,Egan Gary F.ORCID,Ghosh Satrajit S.ORCID,Goscinski Wojtek J.ORCID,Grethe Jeffrey S.ORCID,Kotaleski Jeanette HellgrenORCID,Ho Eric Tatt WeiORCID,Kennedy David N.ORCID,Lanyon Linda J.ORCID,Leergaard Trygve B.ORCID,Mayberg Helen S.ORCID,Milanesi LucianoORCID,Mouček RomanORCID,Poline J. B.ORCID,Roy Prasun K.ORCID,Strother Stephen C.ORCID,Tang Tong BoonORCID,Tiesinga PaulORCID,Wachtler ThomasORCID,Wójcik Daniel K.ORCID,Martone Maryann E.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThere is great need for coordination around standards and best practices in neuroscience to support efforts to make neuroscience a data-centric discipline. Major brain initiatives launched around the world are poised to generate huge stores of neuroscience data. At the same time, neuroscience, like many domains in biomedicine, is confronting the issues of transparency, rigor, and reproducibility. Widely used, validated standards and best practices are key to addressing the challenges in both big and small data science, as they are essential for integrating diverse data and for developing a robust, effective, and sustainable infrastructure to support open and reproducible neuroscience. However, developing community standards and gaining their adoption is difficult. The current landscape is characterized both by a lack of robust, validated standards and a plethora of overlapping, underdeveloped, untested and underutilized standards and best practices. The International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF), an independent organization dedicated to promoting data sharing through the coordination of infrastructure and standards, has recently implemented a formal procedure for evaluating and endorsing community standards and best practices in support of the FAIR principles. By formally serving as a standards organization dedicated to open and FAIR neuroscience, INCF helps evaluate, promulgate, and coordinate standards and best practices across neuroscience. Here, we provide an overview of the process and discuss how neuroscience can benefit from having a dedicated standards body.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Information Systems,General Neuroscience,Software

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3