Intracerebral EEG Artifact Identification Using Convolutional Neural Networks
-
Published:2018-08-13
Issue:2
Volume:17
Page:225-234
-
ISSN:1539-2791
-
Container-title:Neuroinformatics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Neuroinform
Author:
Nejedly PetrORCID, Cimbalnik Jan, Klimes Petr, Plesinger Filip, Halamek Josef, Kremen Vaclav, Viscor Ivo, Brinkmann Benjamin H., Pail Martin, Brazdil Milan, Worrell Gregory, Jurak Pavel
Abstract
AbstractManual and semi-automatic identification of artifacts and unwanted physiological signals in large intracerebral electroencephalographic (iEEG) recordings is time consuming and inaccurate. To date, unsupervised methods to accurately detect iEEG artifacts are not available. This study introduces a novel machine-learning approach for detection of artifacts in iEEG signals in clinically controlled conditions using convolutional neural networks (CNN) and benchmarks the method’s performance against expert annotations. The method was trained and tested on data obtained from St Anne’s University Hospital (Brno, Czech Republic) and validated on data from Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A). We show that the proposed technique can be used as a generalized model for iEEG artifact detection. Moreover, a transfer learning process might be used for retraining of the generalized version to form a data-specific model. The generalized model can be efficiently retrained for use with different EEG acquisition systems and noise environments. The generalized and specialized model F1 scores on the testing dataset were 0.81 and 0.96, respectively. The CNN model provides faster, more objective, and more reproducible iEEG artifact detection compared to manual approaches.
Funder
AZV CR MEYS CR National Institutes of Health Grantová Agentura České Republiky European Regional Development Fund Faculty of Medicine MU
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Information Systems,General Neuroscience,Software
Reference32 articles.
1. Ball, T., Kern, M., Mutschler, I., Aertsen, A., & Schulze-Bonhage, A. (2009). Signal quality of simultaneously recorded invasive and non-invasive EEG. NeuroImage, 46(3), 708–716 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.028. 2. Bern, Universität. (2015). Removal of artifacts from EEG signals using adaptive filter through wavelet transform. no. October. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSP.2008.4697569. 3. Brázdil, M., Pail, M., Halámek, J., Plešinger, F., Cimbálník, J., Roman, R., Klimeš, P., Daniel, P., Chrastina, J., Brichtová, E., Rektor, I., Worrell, G. A., & Jurák, P. (2017). Very high-frequency oscillations: Novel biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone. Annals of Neurology, 82(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25006. 4. Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., & Makeig, S. (2007). Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. 34:1443–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004 5. Gerla, V., Kremen, V., Covassin, N., Lhotska, L., Saifutdinova, E. A., Bukartyk, J., Marik, V., & Somers, V. K. (2017). Automatic identification of artifacts and unwanted physiologic signals in EEG and EOG during wakefulness. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 31. Elsevier Ltd, 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2016.09.006.
Cited by
61 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|