ENIGMA + COINSTAC: Improving Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Re-usability
-
Published:2021-11-30
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1539-2791
-
Container-title:Neuroinformatics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Neuroinform
Author:
Turner Jessica A.ORCID, Calhoun Vince D.ORCID, Thompson Paul M.ORCID, Jahanshad NedaORCID, Ching Christopher R. K., Thomopoulos Sophia I.ORCID, Verner EricORCID, Strauss Gregory P.ORCID, Ahmed Anthony O., Turner Matthew D.ORCID, Basodi Sunitha, Ford Judith M., Mathalon Daniel H., Preda AdrianORCID, Belger AysenilORCID, Mueller Bryon A.ORCID, Lim Kelvin O.ORCID, van Erp Theo G. M.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe FAIR principles, as applied to clinical and neuroimaging data, reflect the goal of making research products Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. The use of the Collaborative Informatics and Neuroimaging Suite Toolkit for Anonymized Computation (COINSTAC) platform in the Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) consortium combines the technological approach of decentralized analyses with the sociological approach of sharing data. In addition, ENIGMA + COINSTAC provides a platform to facilitate the use of machine-actionable data objects. We first present how ENIGMA and COINSTAC support the FAIR principles, and then showcase their integration with a decentralized meta-analysis of sex differences in negative symptom severity in schizophrenia, and finally present ongoing activities and plans to advance FAIR principles in ENIGMA + COINSTAC. ENIGMA and COINSTAC currently represent efforts toward improved Access, Interoperability, and Reusability. We highlight additional improvements needed in these areas, as well as future connections to other resources for expanded Findability.
Funder
National Institute of Mental Health National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Information Systems,General Neuroscience,Software
Reference85 articles.
1. Abel, K. M., Drake, R., & Goldstein, J. M. (2010). Sex differences in schizophrenia. International Review of Psychiatry, 22(5), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2010.515205 2. Ahmed, A. O., Kirkpatrick, B., Galderisi, S., Mucci, A., Rossi, A., Bertolino, A., et al. (2019). Cross-cultural Validation of the 5-Factor Structure of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45(2), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby050 3. Ahmed, A. O., Strauss, G. P., Buchanan, R. W., Kirkpatrick, B., & Carpenter, W. T. (2014). Are Negative Symptoms Dimensional or Categorical? Detection and Validation of Deficit Schizophrenia With Taxometric and Latent Variable Mixture Models. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41(4), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu163 4. Andreassen, N. (1984). SANS: Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. University of Iowa. 5. Baker, B., Damaraju, E., Silva, R., Plis, S. M., & Calhoun, V. D. (2020) (in press). Decentralized Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity: State Analysis in Collaborative Settings. Human Brain Mapping.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|