Abstract
AbstractIn academic research on private R&D investments, sectoral differences are generally analyzed on the basis of firms’ classification according to systems such as the American NAICS and the European NACE industry classification systems. The same classification principles are applied in many countries and regions when aggregating R&D statistics to the level of industries, for example by the EU’s statistical office Eurostat. We report evidence suggesting that the share of R&D associated with development of service-oriented products or with service activities is systematically lower than the share of R&D conducted by service sector firms. Results from a survey run in Sweden shows that the revenue streams in a significant share of R&D-performing service sector firms (as classified according to NACE) are dominated by sales of physical products (e.g. factoryless goods producers). An even larger share report that a majority of their R&D is directed towards development of physical products rather than service products (e.g. consultancy companies acting as external R&D departments for their clients in manufacturing industries). These findings imply that the share of R&D investments focusing on service-oriented activities is even lower than traditional statistics suggest.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Engineering,Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference33 articles.
1. Adams, J. D. (2005). Industrial R&D laboratories: Windows on black boxes? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1/2), 129–137.
2. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.
3. Awuku-Budu, C., & Sveikauskas, L. (2015). Allocation of company research and development expenditures to industries using a Tobit model. US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies. Paper No. CES-WP-15-42.
4. Bernard, A. B., & Fort, T. C. (2015). Factoryless goods producing firms. American Economic Review, 105(5), 518–523.
5. Bhojraj, S., Lee, C. M. C., & Oler, D. K. (2003). What’s my line? A comparison of industry classification schemes for capital market research. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 745–774.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献