Abstract
AbstractThe new knowledge intensive direction of technological change is magnified at the firm level by the limited exhaustibility of knowledge. This limited exhaustibility triggers cumulability and extensibility for which the larger the firm, the lower the knowledge generation costs from using a larger stock of existing knowledge, and the lower the knowledge exploitation costs related to a larger output based on use of the same piece of knowledge. The consequences for the direction of technological change are twofold. First, the larger the firm size, the larger the share of intangible capital in total capital. Second, the output elasticity of intangible capital increases with the size of the firm. We test our hypotheses on data on US listed companies over the period 1977–2016. The results of ordinary least squares, two-stage least squares and production function estimations confirm our theoretical expectations.
Funder
MIUR
Università degli Studi di Torino
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Engineering,Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference77 articles.
1. Acemoglu, D. K. (2002). Directed technological change. Review of Economic Studies, 69(4), 781–810.
2. Acemoglu, D. K. (2003). Labor- and capital-augmenting technical change. Journal of European Economic Association, 1(1), 1–37.
3. Acemoglu, D. K. (2015). Localised and biased technologies: Atkinson and Stiglitz’s new view, induced innovations, and directed technological change. The Economic Journal, 125(583), 443–463.
4. Ackerberg, D., Caves, K., & Frazer, G. (2006). Structural identification of production functions. MPRA paper 38349. University Library of Munich.
5. Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., & Frazer, G. (2015). Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica, 83(6), 2411–2451.