Abstract
AbstractHow did Chinese leaders Deng Xiaoping and Zhao Ziyang feel about Hong Kong? The existing literature has tended to see the Sino-British negotiations over the future of Hong Kong through the economic lens favoured by the British side and described the Chinese side as primarily motivated by nationalism. However, ‘nationalism’ remains a vague concept in need of further definition. This paper focuses on the Chinese side of the negotiation table. It unpacks what ‘nationalism’ meant to Deng and Zhao within the context of the negotiations by examining three interrelated components: history, identity and emotion. This paper then analyses how the Chinese side used history, identity and emotion strategically during the negotiations, focusing on the September 1982 leaders’ meetings as a case study. Adopting a constructivist lens, this paper examines historical documents against frameworks and theories from the social sciences, producing an interdisciplinary analysis of Chinese negotiation tactics. It unravels how China’s leaders used the country’s past to broadcast the Party’s stance to the people, bolster their leadership position and win the advantage over Britain in the Hong Kong negotiations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I., & McDermott, R. (2009). Identity as a Variable. In Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I., & McDermott, R. (Eds.), Measuring Identity: A Guide for Social Scientists (pp. 17–32). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810909.002
2. Barmé, G. R. (1995). To Screw Foreigners is Patriotic: China’s Avant-Garde Nationalists. The China Journal, 34, 209–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950138
3. Barrell, R., & Broadbent, S. (1995). Hong Kong, China and the United Kingdom. In Toida, M., & Hiratsuka, D. (Eds.), The Return of Hong Kong to China and the Asian Industrializing Region (pp. 152–164). Institute of Developing Economies.
4. Brown, K. (2022). Knowing and Feeling the “China Dream”: Logic and Rhetoric in the Political Language of Xi’s China. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026221121683
5. Callahan, W. A. (2006). History, Identity, and Security: Producing and Consuming Nationalism in China. Critical Asian Studies, 38(2), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672710600671087