Abstract
AbstractThis study was designed to predict the post-weaning weights of Akkaraman lambs reared on different farms using multiple linear regression and machine learning algorithms. The effect of factors the age of the dam, gender, type of lambing, enterprise, type of flock, birth weight, and weaning weight was analyzed. The data was collected from a total of 25,316 Akkaraman lambs raised at multiple farms in the Çiftlik District of Niğde province. Comparative analysis was conducted by using multiple linear regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (and Support Vector Regression), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) (and Gradient Boosting), Bayesian Regularized Neural Network, Radial Basis Function Neural Network, Classification and Regression Trees, Exhaustive Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (and Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection), and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines algorithms. In this study, the test dataset was divided into five layers using the K-fold cross-validation method. The performance of models was compared using performance criteria such as Adjusted R-squared (Adj-$${R}^{2}$$), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) by utilizing test populations in the predicted models. Additionally, the presence of low standard deviations for these criteria indicates the absence of an overfitting problem. $${R}^{2}$$The comparison results showed the Random Forest algorithm had the best predictive performance compared to other algorithms with Adj-$${R}^{2}$$, RMSE, MAD, and MAPE values of 0.75, 3.683, 2.876, and 10.112, respectively. In conclusion, the results obtained through Multiple Linear Regression for the live weights of Akkaraman lambs were less accurate than the results obtained through artificial neural network analysis.
Funder
Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Ali M, Eyduran E, Tariq MM, Tirink C, Abbas F, Bajwa MA, Baloch MH, Nizamani AH, Waheed A, Awan MA, Shah SH, Ahmad Z, Jan S (2015) Comparison of artificial neural network and decision tree algorithms used for predicting live weight at post-weaning period from some biometrical characteristics in Harnai sheep. Pak J Zool 47(6):1579–1585. http://www.zsp.com.pk/pdf47/1579-1585%20(10)%20QPJZ-0146-2015%2014-7-15%20REVISEDVERSION_FINAL.pdf
2. Biggs D, De Ville B, Suen E (1991) A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. J Applied Statistics 18:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769100000005
3. Boujenane I, Halhaly S (2015) Estimation of body weight from heart girth in Sardi and Timahdite sheep using different models. Iran J Appl Anim Sci 5(3):639–646
4. Breiman L (eds) (2017) Classification and regression trees, 6th edn. Taylor and Francis Group, New York, p 368
5. Canaza-Cayo AW, Churata-Huacani R, Çakmakçı C, Rodríguez-Huanca FH, Filho deSB, Fernandes JS, T. J., and, De La Cruz YCR (2024) Use of machine learning approaches for body weight prediction in Peruvian Corriedale Sheep. Smart Agri Technol, p 100419