Abstract
AbstractMany studies have shown how practical learning and the hands-on activities help students to conceptualize technological knowledge and develop their intellectual processes. Researchers have also pointed out that a variety of cognitive skills and higher-order thinking skills can be nurtured through their application to a practical context. Learning by doing and creating things using the hands have always been key elements in Finnish craft and technology education.The overall purpose of this study was to explore and produce knowledge about the pedagogical approach of learning by-doing and making in the context of craft and technology education in Finland. The study focused on the learning processes when students were acting (doing and making) in craft lessons, but the aim was also to develop a pedagogical tool for teachers to better observe and guide the development of their students’ technological understanding. First, a qualitative theory-oriented content analysis was performed to examine the extent of the learning-by-doing approach in craft and technology education in the National Core Curriculum for Basic Education (Määräykset ja ohjeet 2014:96, Juvenes Print – Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy, Tampere, 2014) document. In the analysis, Roberts (Beyond learning by doing: theoretical currents in experiential education, Routledge, New York, 2012) descriptions of four philosophical tenets for pragmatism were utilised. To gain broader knowledge regarding the pedagogical approach of learning by-doing in craft and technology educational practices a questionnaire for students who were studying craft and technology education was created. The questions were formulated on the basis of Roberts’ (2012) four philosophical tenets so that each tenet was representative to provide knowledge on the phenomenon.This data were analyzed using the frequentist descriptive method by identifying students’ descriptions of each category. The findings of this study support the argument that technology education has the potential to develop students’ skills in many ways by providing pupils with opportunities to work in a practical way, accessing the domain of technological knowledge and working technologically. It was also evidenced that social interaction and learning from peers is a highly present component in craft and technology education lessons.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Engineering,Education
Reference39 articles.
1. Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24(3), 275–294.
2. Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the challenge. New York: Routledge.
3. Barak, M., & Albert, D. (2017). Fostering systematic inventive thinking (SIT) and self-regulated learning (SRL) in problem-solving and troubleshooting processes among engineering experts in industry. Australasian Journal of Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v4i1.45.
4. Barlex, D., & Steeg, T. (2018). Maker education in the English context. In N. Sheery, J. Buckley, D. Canty & J. Phelan (Eds.), Proceedings from PATT36 conference: Research and practice in technology education: perspectives on human capacity and development (pp. 341–359). Athlone: Athlone Institute of Technology, Co. Westmeath.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献