Abstract
AbstractDesign-Based Learning (DBL) is a pedagogical approach where learning is situated in the context of design activities that are typically carried out in groups. During collaborative design inquiry, reflection is of vital importance for learning from design experience. The paper presents a research-through-design study with the intention to generate knowledge on how to design for supporting reflection-in-action during design-based learning. This study addresses the research question: how can a media tool support a group of students in externalizing reflection while they are engaging in DBL? This paper describes the design and evaluation of ReflectionSchema, a tool intended to support reflection-in-action in such a learning environment. The tool offers visualized guidance for coordinating a group of students’ understanding of how they can combine reflecting with making design representations. The tool was trialed by 13 groups of students aged 12 to 13, who used the tool to record short reflection videos along their whole DBL process. We analyzed the efficacy of ReflectionSchema in terms of supporting collaborative reflection-in-action. Furthermore, we investigated the process of reflection-in-action during Design-based learning processes by examining the collaborative reflection patterns in the reflection videos that include the actions, roles, recording preference/style, and strategies employed. We discussed how these findings can inform the design of other reflection tools for similar settings.
Funder
China Scholarship Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Engineering,Education
Reference50 articles.
1. Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
2. Bittner, E. A. C., & Leimeister, J. M. (2013). Why shared understanding matters - Engineering a collaboration process for shared understanding to improve collaboration effectiveness in heterogeneous teams. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.608
3. Böhm, A., Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2004). Theoretical Coding: Text Analysis in Grounded Theory. A Companion to Qualitative Research, (January 2004), pp. 270–275.
4. Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(90), 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.16
5. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1996). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. Boundaries of Adult Learning, 1, 32–56.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献