Framing the constructive alignment of design within technology subjects in general education

Author:

Buckley Jeffrey,Seery Niall,Gumaelius Lena,Canty Donal,Doyle Andrew,Pears Arnold

Abstract

AbstractDesign is core element of general technology education internationally. While there is a degree of contention with regards to its treatment, there is general consensus that the inclusion of design in some form is important, if not characteristic, of the subject area. Acknowledging that design is important, there are many questions which need to be considered in order to guide policy and practice, such as whether a singular general design ability can be explicitly defined empirically beyond an implicit verbal definition, and whether it can be taught and assessed. In order to address these questions in a systematic fashion, a framework is needed in order to guide relevant investigations. Having such a framework would allow for theory to be generated, hypotheses to be tested, and assumptions to be challenged. In response to this apparent need, this article presents a theoretical discussion pertaining to the constructive alignment of learning to design, wherein theories of knowledge, variation theory, knowledge transfer, and assessment validity and reliability are reflected upon.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Engineering,Education

Reference106 articles.

1. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

2. Anderson, J. (1983). The architect of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

3. Ankiewicz, P., & De Swardt, E. (2006). Some implications of the philosophy of technology for Science, Technology and Society (STS) studies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(2), 117–141.

4. Atkinson, S. (2017). So what went wrong and why? In E. Norman & K. Baynes (Eds.), Design epistemology and curriculum planning (pp. 13–17). Loughborough: Loughborough Design Press.

5. Barlex, D. (2007). Assessing capability in design and technology: The case for a minimally invasive approach. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 12(2), 49–56.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. 3D technologies in STEAM education;Discover Education;2024-07-08

2. Making tacit knowledge explicit: the case for online peer feedback in the studio critique;International Journal of Technology and Design Education;2024-06-04

3. The disciplinary matrix of applied arts and artistic cultures;The Curriculum Journal;2024-02-13

4. Editorial: Current perspectives on the value, teaching, learning, and assessment of design in STEM education;Frontiers in Education;2023-08-01

5. Estimating the replicability of technology education research;International Journal of Technology and Design Education;2022-11-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3