The effect of teacher’s confidence on technology and engineering curriculum provision

Author:

Jones Lewis C. R.ORCID,McDermott Hilary J.ORCID,Tyrer John R.ORCID,Zanker Nigel P.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractSecondary school, age range 11–14, technology and engineering education in England has been delivered mainly within Design and Technology (D&T). This inadvertently makes D&T teachers responsible for pupils’ engineering education and motivation. This paper analyses D&T teachers’ (N = 33) technology subject knowledge through self-assessment competency questionnaires, before and after developing a Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)-focused project of their choice for their classroom. Participants were least confident in teaching the areas of technology that required mathematics and scientific knowledge. The results analyse a suggested misalignment between teachers’ Creative Arts background subject knowledge compared to the technology subject knowledge required for engineering education. Suggested causes of this issue are Initial Teacher Training standards and curriculum flexibility, not teacher capability. The paper concludes that teachers have been unaware of some elements of STEM education and that continuing professional development interventions are required to assist teachers and improve their engineering knowledge in order to better equip their pupils for engineering.

Funder

London Schools Excellence Fund

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Engineering,Education

Reference79 articles.

1. Ankiewicz, P. (2015). The implications of the philosophy of technology for the academic majors of technology student teachers. In M. Chatoney (Ed.), Plurality and complementarity of approaches in design and technology education: PATT 29 conference proceedings (pp. 13–25). Marseille, France.

2. Atkins. (2015). The skills deficit: Consequences and opportunities for UK infrastructure. Available at: https://www.atkinsglobal.com/~/media/Files/A/Atkins-Corporate/uk-and-europe/uk-thought-leadership/reports/The%20Skills%20Deficit%20Full%20Report_final.pdf.

3. Atkinson, S. (2000). Does the need for high levels of performance curtail the development of creativity in design and technology project work? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(3), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008904330356.

4. Atkinson, S. (2011). The relationship between the time spent studying subject knowledge and the attitude of trainee teachers to the subject(s) they will teach. The Journal of Technology Studies, 37(1), 17–30.

5. Banks, F. (1996a). Approaches and models in technology teacher education: An overview. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 1(3), 197–211.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3