Author:
Dörfler C.,Hocke T.,Hast A.,Hoppe U.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Improvement of speech perception in quiet is an important goal of hearing aid provision. In practice, results are highly variable. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between type and extent of hearing loss (audiogram type), maximum word recognition score, and aided speech perception.
Materials and methods
Pure tone and speech audiometric data of 740 ears in 370 patients were reviewed. All subjects visited our hearing center for hearing aid evaluation between 2012 and 2017. The maximum word recognition score (WRSmax) and the monosyllabic speech recognition score with hearing aids, WRS65(HA) were analyzed for 10 different standard audiogram types.
Results
The WRS65(HA) with hearing aids for different degrees of hearing loss is, within error boundaries, comparable to previous investigations and shows a difference of 10–20 percentage points to the WRSmax. This difference tends to be larger for flat and moderately sloping audiograms compared to steep-sloping audiograms. The ratio WRS65(HA)/WRSmax can be interpreted as an efficiency factor for hearing aid provision, since it relates speech recognition with hearing aids to the maximally achievable information carrying capacity of the hearing impaired.
Conclusion
The expectation regarding hearing aid provision has to be adjusted according to maximum word recognition score, the derived quality measures, degree of hearing loss, and audiogram type.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Bisgaard N, Vlaming MS, Dahlquist M (2010) Standard audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 measurement procedure. Trends Amplif 14:113–120
2. Braun B, Dietrich A, Akcicek B et al (2015) Hörgeräteversorgung. Folgen der Festbetragsverdoppelung auf Compliance, Ergebnisqualität und Zuzahlungen. HNO 63:850–856
3. Dillon H (2012) Hearing aids, 2 edn. Thieme, New York, Stuttgart
4. Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4 edn. SAGE, Los Angeles
5. BAnz AT 02.10.2018 B2;Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss,2018
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献