Abstract
AbstractBased on the continuum model of impression formation (Fiske & Neuberg, 1990), information processing can be more or less automated or controlled and thus relies more or less on stereotype-based or individual-based characteristics. Also, teachers’ impression formation can be influenced by social categories like students’ ethnic background or social status. However, when teachers form an impression of students’ abilities or performance social categories should not play a role. But a lot of empirical findings show that teachers make a difference depending on students’ backgrounds. Whether this can be explained by a more automated or controlled information processing depending on students’ backgrounds is still an open question. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to investigate teacher students’ impression formation in dependence on students’ ethnic backgrounds and social status. In order to investigate whether information processing differs according to students’ ethnic backgrounds and social status, an experimental eye-tracking study with 45 teacher students was designed. As physiological processes are strongly connected to psychological processes, specific eye-movements can be interpreted as indicators for physiological arousal in first place, but might also allow conclusions about mental processes like information processing. Pupil diameter and blink rate were measured while participants read three case vignettes with manipulated student background. Analysis of variance with repeated measures showed differences in pupil diameter and blink rate according to students’ background. Results showed less arousal when forming an impression about students without immigrant background and with high social status compared to students with immigrant background and with low social status. This might indicate more automated information processing for non-immigrant students with high-status, and more controlled processing for students with immigrant background and low-status.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Universität Augsburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Social Psychology,Education
Reference108 articles.
1. Alvidrez, J., & Weinstein, R. S. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.91.4.731
2. American Psychological Association (2012). Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology’s contributions to understanding and reducing disparities. http://www.apa.org/ed/re-sources/racial-disparities.aspx
3. Arnold, K. H., Bos, W., Richert, P., & Stubbe, T. C. (2007). Schullaufbahnpräferenzen am Ende der vierten Klassenstufe [School recommendation at the end of fourth grade]. In W. Bos, S. Hornberg, K. H. Arnold, G. Faust, L. Fried, E. M. Lankes, et al. (Eds.), IGLU 2006: Lesekompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. Waxmann
4. Asbrock, F. (2010). Stereotypes of social groups in Germany in terms of warmth and competence. Social Psychology, 41(2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000011
5. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 41(3), 258–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献