Reporting frequency of radiology findings increases after introducing visual rating scales in the primary care diagnostic work up of subjective and mild cognitive impairment

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Study the effect of introducing a template for radiological reporting of non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) in the primary care diagnostic work up of cognitive impairment using visual rating scales (VRS). Methods Radiology reports were assessed regarding compliance with a contextual report template and the reporting of the parameters medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), white matter changes (WMC), global cortical atrophy (GCA), and width of lateral ventricles (WLV) using established VRS in two age-matched groups examined with NECT before (n = 111) and after (n = 125) the introduction of contextual reporting at our department. True positive rate (TPR) and true negative rate (TNR) before and after were compared. Results We observed a significant increase in the percentage of radiology reports with mentioning of MTA from 29 to 76% (p < 0.001), WMC from 69 to 86% (p < 0.01), and GCA from 54 to 82% (p < 0.001). We observed a significant increase in the percentages of reports where all of the parameters were mentioned, from 6 to 29% (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in TPR from 10 to 55% for MTA. Conclusion This study suggests that contextual radiological assessment using VRS could increase the reporting frequency of radiology findings in the diagnostic work up of cognitive impairment but compliance with templates may be difficult to endorse. Key Points • Introducing visual rating scales in clinical practice increases the reporting frequency of MTA, WMC, and GCA in the diagnostic work up of subjective and mild cognitive impairment. • Introducing visual rating scales has an effect on the true positive rate of reported MTA. • Compliance with contextual radiology templates remains low when use of the template is not enforced by the department leadership.