Soft tissue tumor imaging in adults: European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology-Guidelines 2023—overview, and primary local imaging: how and where?

Author:

Noebauer-Huhmann Iris-MelanieORCID,Vanhoenacker Filip M.,Vilanova Joan C.,Tagliafico Alberto S.,Weber Marc-André,Lalam Radhesh K.,Grieser Thomas,Nikodinovska Violeta Vasilevska,de Rooy Jacky W. J.,Papakonstantinou Olympia,Mccarthy Catherine,Sconfienza Luca Maria,Verstraete Koenraad,Martel-Villagrán José,Szomolanyi Pavol,Lecouvet Frédéric E.,Afonso Diana,Albtoush Omar M.,Aringhieri Giacomo,Arkun Remide,Aström Gunnar,Bazzocchi Alberto,Botchu Rajesh,Breitenseher Martin,Chaudhary Snehansh,Dalili Danoob,Davies Mark,de Jonge Milko C.,Mete Berna D.,Fritz Jan,Gielen Jan L. M. A.,Hide Geoff,Isaac Amanda,Ivanoski Slavcho,Mansour Ramy M.,Muntaner-Gimbernat Lorenzo,Navas Ana,O´Donnell Paul,Örgüç Şebnem,Rennie Winston,Resano Santiago,Robinson Philip,Sanal Hatice T.,Ter Horst Simone A. J.,van Langevelde Kirsten,Wörtler Klaus,Koelz Marita,Panotopoulos Joannis,Windhager Reinhard,Bloem Johannes L.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Early, accurate diagnosis is crucial for the prognosis of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. To this end, standardization of imaging algorithms, technical requirements, and reporting is therefore a prerequisite. Since the first European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus in 2015, technical achievements, further insights into specific entities, and the revised WHO-classification (2020) and AJCC staging system (2017) made an update necessary. The guidelines are intended to support radiologists in their decision-making and contribute to interdisciplinary tumor board discussions. Materials and methods A validated Delphi method based on peer-reviewed literature was used to derive consensus among a panel of 46 specialized musculoskeletal radiologists from 12 European countries. Statements were scored online by level of agreement (0 to 10) during two iterative rounds. Either “group consensus,” “group agreement,” or “lack of agreement” was achieved. Results Eight sections were defined that finally contained 145 statements with comments. Overall, group consensus was reached in 95.9%, and group agreement in 4.1%. This communication contains the first part consisting of the imaging algorithm for suspected soft tissue tumors, methods for local imaging, and the role of tumor centers. Conclusion Ultrasound represents the initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small tumors. MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of most soft tissue tumors. CT is indicated in special situations. In suspicious or likely malignant tumors, a specialist tumor center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion. This should be done before performing a biopsy, without exception. Clinical relevance The updated ESSR soft tissue tumor imaging guidelines aim to provide best practice expert consensus for standardized imaging, to support radiologists in their decision-making, and to improve examination comparability both in individual patients and in future studies on individualized strategies. Key Points • Ultrasound remains the best initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small suspected soft tissue tumors. • MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of soft tissue tumors in most cases; CT is indicated in special situations. Suspicious or likely malignant tumors should undergo biopsy. • In patients with large, indeterminate or suspicious tumors, a tumor reference center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion; this must be done before a biopsy.

Funder

Medical University of Vienna

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, 5th ed. (2020) Volume 3; chapter 1,2 and 4, pages 1–333, 501–505, 510–513, and 520–527. Available from: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Who-Classification-Of-Tumours/Soft-Tissue-And-Bone-Tumours-2020

2. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB et al (2017) The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 67(2):93–99. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21388

3. Panteli D, Legido-Quigley H, Reichebner C et al (2019) Clinical practice guidelines as a quality strategy. In: Busse R, Klazinga N, Panteli D et al (eds) Improving healthcare quality in Europe: characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies. Health Policy Series 53. World Health Organization (acting as the host organization for, and secretariat of, the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies) and OECD, pp 233–264. Available from: https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int

4. Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D (2021) Delphi methodology in healthcare research: how to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol 11(4):116–129. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116

5. Taylor E (2020) We agree, don’t we? The Delphi method for health environments research. HERD 13(1):11–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586719887709

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3