Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to develop a procedure to investigate the occurrence, character and causes of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging incidents.
Methods
A semi-structured questionnaire was developed containing details such as safety zones, examination complexity, staff MR knowledge, staff categories, and implementation of EU directive 2013/35. We focused on formally reported incidents that had occurred during 2014–2019, and unreported incidents during one year. Thirteen clinical MR units were visited, and the managing radiographer was interviewed. Open questions were analysed using conventionally adopted content analysis.
Results
Thirty-seven written reports for 5 years and an additional 12 oral reports for 1 year were analysed. Only 38% of the incidents were reported formally. Some of these incidents were catastrophic. Negative correlations were observed between the number of annual incidents (per scanner) and staff MR knowledge (Spearman’s rho − 0.41, p < 0.05) as well as the number of MR physicists per scanner (− 0.48, p < 0.05). It was notable that only half of the sites had implemented the EU directive. Quotes like ‘Burns are to be expected in MR’ and not even knowing the name of the incident reporting system suggested an inadequate safety culture. Finally, there was a desire among staff for MR safety education.
Conclusions
MR-related incidents were greatly underreported, and some incidents could have had catastrophic outcomes. There is a great desire among radiographers to enhance the safety culture, but to achieve this, much more accessible education is required, as well as focused involvement of the management of the operations.
Key Points
• Only one in three magnetic resonance–related incidents were reported.
• Several magnetic resonance incidents could have led to catastrophic consequences.
• Much increased knowledge about magnetic resonance safety is needed by radiologists and radiographers.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference23 articles.
1. WorldHealthOrganization (2019) 10 facts on patient safety. Available via https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/patient_safety/en/. Accessed March 12 2020
2. Socialdepartementet (2010) Patientsäkerhetslagen (SFS 2010:659). Available via https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/patientsakerhetslag-2010659_sfs-2010-659. Accessed March 12 2020
3. Rutberg H (2019) Vårdrelaterade infektioner Kostnader och konsekvenser - Kortversion av SKR rapport 2019. Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner. Available via https://webbutik.skr.se/bilder/artiklar/pdf/7585-813-5.pdf?issuusl=ignore. Accessed March 12 2020
4. Khazi S, Shetty S, Reddy S, Vannala V, Shetty R, Shetty P (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging mishaps: a brief review. J Datta Meghe Inst Med Sci Univ 13:160–161
5. European Society of Radiology (ESR), European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) (2019) Patient safety in medical imaging: a joint paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Radiography (Lond) 25:e26–e38
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献