Contrast-enhanced CT techniques and MRI perform equally well in arthritis imaging of the hand: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To investigate the performance of dual-energy CT (DECT)-generated iodine maps (iMap) and CT subtraction (CT-S) in the detection of synovitis, tenosynovitis, and peritendonitis/paratenonitis compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) as standard of reference. Methods This IRB-approved prospective study consecutively investigated patients with undifferentiated arthritis. All patients underwent MSUS, MRI and contrast-enhanced DECT of the hand; from the latter conventional CT-S, image-based iMap (iMap-I) and raw data-based iMap (iMap-RD) were reconstructed. CT and MRI datasets were scored for synovitis and tenosynovitis/paratenonitis applying the modified Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Score (RAMRIS). Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Non-inferiority was tested using the one-tailed McNemar test. Correlation of sum scores was assessed using Pearson’s test. Interreader reliability was assessed using Cohen’s kappa. Results Overall, 33 patients were included. MSUS was positive for synovitis and tenosynovitis/paratenonitis in 28 patients with a sum score of 6.91. Excellent correlation with MSUS was shown for CT-S (sum score 6.38; r = 0.91), iMap-RD (sum score 9.74; r = 0.82), MRI (sum score 12.70; r = 0.85), and iMap-I (sum score 6.94; r = 0.50). CT-S had the highest diagnostic accuracy of 83%, followed by iMap-I (78%), MRI (75%), and iMap-RD (74%). All modalities showed non-inferiority. Reader agreement was good for CT-S and MRI (κ = 0.62; 0.64) and fair for iMap-RD and iMap-I (κ = 0.31; 0.37). Conclusion CT-S and iMap allow highly standardized arthritis imaging and are suitable for clinical practice. MSUS still has the highest availability for arthritis imaging and served as gold standard for this study. Key Points • CT subtraction, iodine map with dual-energy CT, and MRI showed non-inferiority to musculoskeletal ultrasound. • MRI was the most sensitive but least specific imaging technique compared with CT subtraction and dual-energy CT. • CT subtraction showed the best correlation with musculoskeletal ultrasound.