Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To systematically investigate the usability of virtual non-contrast reconstructions (VNC) derived from dual-layer CT (DLCT) for detection and size measurements of kidney stones with regards to different degrees of surrounding iodine-induced attenuation and radiation dose.
Methods
Ninety-two kidney stones of varying size (3–14 mm) and composition were placed in a phantom filled with different contrast media/water mixtures exhibiting specific iodine-induced attenuation (0–1500 HU). DLCT-scans were acquired using CTDIvol of 2 mGy and 10 mGy. Conventional images (CI) and VNC0H-1500HU were reconstructed. Reference stone size was determined using a digital caliper (Man-M). Visibility and stone size were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using the McNemar test, Wilcoxon test, and the coefficient of determination.
Results
All stones were visible on CI0HU and VNC200HU. Starting at VNC400 HU, the detection rate decreased with increasing HU and was significantly lower as compared to CI0HU on VNC≥ 600HU (100.0 vs. 94.0%, p < 0.05). The overall detection rate was higher using 10 mGy as compared to 2 mGy protocol (87.9 vs. 81.8%; p < 0.001). Stone size was significantly overestimated on all VNC compared to Man-M (7.0 ± 3.5 vs. 6.6 ± 2.8 mm, p < 0.001). Again, the 10 mGy protocol tended to show a better correlation with Man-M as compared to 2 mGy protocol (R2 = 0.39–0.68 vs. R2 = 0.31–0.57).
Conclusions
Detection and size measurements of kidney stones surrounded by contrast media on VNC are feasible. The detection rate of kidney stones decreases with increasing iodine-induced attenuation and with decreasing radiation dose as well as stone size, while remaining comparable to CI0HU on VNC ≤ 400 HU.
Key Points
• The detection rate of kidney stones on VNC depends on the surrounding iodine-induced attenuation, the used radiation dose, and the stone size.
• The detection rate of kidney stones on VNC decreases with greater iodine-induced attenuation and with lower radiation dose, particularly in small stones.
• The visibility of kidney stones on VNC≤ 400 HUremains comparable to true-non-contrast scans even when using a low-dose technique.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. Lazar M, Ringl H, Baltzer P, et al (2020) Protocol analysis of dual-energy CT for optimization of kidney stone detection in virtual non-contrast reconstructions. Eur Radiol https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06806-9
2. Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, et al (2017) Correction: kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Prim 3:. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.1
3. Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD et al (2020) AUA Microhematuria 2020. J Urol 204:778–786
4. Türk C, Neisius A, Petřík A et al (2018) EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis 2018. In: European Association of Urology Guidelines. 2018 Edition. The European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
5. Elkoushy MA, Andonian S (2017) Lifetime radiation exposure in patients with recurrent nephrolithiasis. Curr Urol Rep 18:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0731-6
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献