Author:
Rossi Alexia,Gennari Antonio G.,Etter Dominik,Benz Dominik C.,Sartoretti Thomas,Giannopoulos Andreas A.,Mikail Nidaa,Bengs Susan,Maurer Alexander,Gebhard Catherine,Buechel Ronny R.,Kaufmann Philipp A.,Fuchs Tobias A.,Messerli Michael
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) have been recently introduced as an alternative to filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms for computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of DLIR on image quality and quantification of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in comparison to FBP.
Methods
One hundred patients were consecutively enrolled. Image quality–associated variables (noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) as well as CAC-derived parameters (Agatston score, mass, and volume) were calculated from images reconstructed by using FBP and three different strengths of DLIR (low (DLIR_L), medium (DLIR_M), and high (DLIR_H)). Patients were stratified into 4 risk categories according to the Coronary Artery Calcium - Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) classification: 0 Agatston score (very low risk), 1–99 Agatston score (mildly increased risk), Agatston 100–299 (moderately increased risk), and ≥ 300 Agatston score (moderately-to-severely increased risk).
Results
In comparison to standard FBP, increasing strength of DLIR was associated with a significant and progressive decrease of image noise (p < 0.001) alongside a significant and progressive increase of both SNR and CNR (p < 0.001). The use of incremental levels of DLIR was associated with a significant decrease of Agatston CAC score and CAC volume (p < 0.001), while mass score remained unchanged when compared to FBP (p = 0.232). The underestimation of Agatston CAC led to a CAC-DRS misclassification rate of 8%.
Conclusion
DLIR systematically underestimates Agatston CAC score. Therefore, DLIR should be used cautiously for cardiovascular risk assessment.
Key Points
• In coronary artery calcium imaging, the implementation of deep learning image reconstructions improves image quality, by decreasing the level of image noise.
• Deep learning image reconstructions systematically underestimate Agatston coronary artery calcium score.
• Deep learning image reconstructions should be used cautiously in clinical routine to measure Agatston coronary artery calcium score for cardiovascular risk assessment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference20 articles.
1. Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS (1995) Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 92:2157–2162
2. Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ et al (2008) Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med 358:1336–1345
3. Erbel R, Mohlenkamp S, Moebus S et al (2010) Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1397–1406
4. Mitchell JD, Fergestrom N, Gage BF et al (2018) Impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes following coronary artery calcium scoring. J Am Coll Cardiol 72:3233–3242
5. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA et al (2019) 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 140:e596–e646
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献