Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To assess the interobserver reliability (IOR) of the Tile classification system, and its potential influence on outcomes, for the interpretation of CT images of pelvic fractures by radiologists and surgeons.
Methods
Retrospective data (1/2008–12/2016) from 238 patients with pelvic fractures were analyzed. Mean patient age was 44 years (SD 20); 66% were male. There were 54 Tile A, 82 Tile B, and 102 Tile C type injuries. The 30-day mortality rate was 15% (36/238). Six observers, three radiologists, and three surgeons with different levels of experience (attending/resident/intern) classified each fracture into one of the 26 second-order subcategories of the Tile classification. Weighted kappa coefficients were used to assess the IORs for the three main categories and nine first-order subcategories.
Results
The overall IORs of the Tile system for the main categories and first-order subcategories were moderate (kappa = 0.44) and fair (kappa = 0.31), respectively. IOR was fair to moderate among radiologists, but only fair among surgeons. By level of training, IOR was moderate between attendings and between residents, whereas it was only fair between interns. IOR was moderate to substantial (kappa = 0.56–0.70) between the radiology attending and resident. Association of the Tile fracture type with 30-day mortality was present based on two out of six observer ratings.
Conclusions
The overall IOR of the Tile classification system is only fair to moderate, increases with the level of rater experience and is better among radiologists than surgeons. In the light of these findings, results from studies using this classification system must be interpreted cautiously.
Key Points
• The overall interobserver reliability of the Tile pelvic fracture classification is only fair to moderate.
• Interobserver reliability increases with observer experience and radiologists have higher kappa coefficients than surgeons.
• Interobserver reliability has an impact on the association of the Tile classification system with mortality in two out of six cases.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference52 articles.
1. Hauschild O, Strohm PC, Culemann U et al (2008) Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German pelvic injury register. J Trauma 64:449–455
2. Balogh Z, King KL, Mackay P et al (2007) The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study. J Trauma 63:1066–1073
3. Yoshihara H, Yoneoka D (2014) Demographic epidemiology of unstable pelvic fracture in the United States from 2000 to 2009: trends and in-hospital mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:380–385
4. Hermans E, Biert J, Edwards MJR (2017) Epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures in a level 1 trauma center in the Netherlands. Hip Pelvis 29:253–261
5. Gabbe BJ, de Steiger R, Esser M, Bucknill A, Russ MK, Cameron PA (2011) Predictors of mortality following severe pelvic ring fracture: results of a population-based study. Injury 42:985–991
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献