Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions

Published:2023-04-12 Issue:9 Volume:33 Page:6189-6203
ISSN:1432-1084
Container-title:European Radiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur Radiol

Author:

Cohen Ethan O.^ORCID,Korhonen Katrina E.,Sun Jia,Leung Jessica W. T.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-023-09581-5.pdf

Reference32 articles.

1. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE et al (2013) Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology 266:104–113

2. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL et al (2014) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 311:2499–2507

3. Cohen EO, Weaver OO, Tso HH, Gerlach KE, Leung JWT (2020) Breast cancer screening via digital mammography, synthetic mammography, and tomosynthesis. Am J Prev Med 58:470–472

4. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Niklason LT et al (2019) Digital mammography versus digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: the Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Radiology 291:23–30

5. Roth RG, Maidment ADA, Weinstein SP, Roth SO, Conant EF (2014) Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation. Radiographics 34:E89-e102

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Suspicious Ultrasound-Occult Non-Calcified Mammographic Masses, Asymmetries, and Architectural Distortions Are Moderate Probability for Malignancy;Cancers;2024-02-03