Comparative reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in imaging research: evaluation of current practices-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in imaging research: evaluation of current practices

Published:2019-03-21 Issue:10 Volume:29 Page:5386-5394
ISSN:0938-7994
Container-title:European Radiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur Radiol

Author:

Dehmoobad Sharifabadi Anahita,Leeflang Mariska,Treanor Lee,Kraaijpoel Noemie,Salameh Jean-Paul,Alabousi Mostafa,Asraoui Nabil,Choo-Foo Jade,Takwoingi Yemisi,Deeks Jonathan J.,McInnes Matthew D. F.^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-019-06045-7.pdf

Reference36 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine (US) Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care (2009) Learning what works: infrastructure required for comparative effectiveness research: workshop summary. Appendix C, Comparative Effectiveness Research Priorities: IOM Recommendations Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US). Available via https://www.nap.edu/read/12214/chapter/2 . Accessed 11 Oct 2018

2. Godlee F (2010) More research is needed - but what type? BMJ 341:c4662

3. Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine. Available via http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Activities/Research/CERPriorities.aspx . Accessed 13 Aug 2018

4. America RSoN. RSNA/ASNR comparative effectiveness research training (CERT) program. Available via https://www.rsna.org/education/workshops/comparative-effectiveness-research-training . Accessed 11 Oct 2018

5. A collaborative training program in Biomedical Big Data and Comparative Effectiveness Research (2018) Value of Imaging through Comparative Effectiveness (VOICE)

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How to Critically Appraise and Interpret Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy: A User Guide;Radiology;2023-05-01

2. Diagnostic Performance of the 2018 EASL vs. LI‐RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Comparative Studies;Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging;2023-04-03

3. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS v2018 versus KLCA-NCC 2018 Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Hepatobiliary Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies;Gut and Liver;2022-11-01

4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac MRI versus FDG PET for Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Radiology;2022-09

5. Writing a Successful Systematic Review Manuscript for a Radiology Journal;Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal;2022-08-31