Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Quality assurance (QA) of image interpretation plays a key role in screening and diagnostic mammography, maintaining minimum standards and supporting continuous improvement in interpreting images. However, the QA structure across Europe shows considerable variation. The European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) conducted a survey among the members to collect information on radiologists’ preferences regarding QA measures in mammography.
Materials and methods
An anonymous online survey consisting of 25 questions was distributed to all EUSOBI members and national breast radiology bodies in Europe. The questions were designed to collect demographic characteristics, information on responders’ mammography workload and data about QA measures currently used in their country. Data was analysed using descriptive statistical analysis, the χ2 test, linear regression, and Durbin-Watson statistic test.
Results
In total, 251 breast radiologists from 34 countries completed the survey. Most respondents were providing both screening and symptomatic services (137/251, 54.6%), working in an academic hospital (85/251, 33.9%) and reading 1000–4999 cases per year (109/251, 43.4%). More than half of them (133/251, 53%) had established QA measures in their workplace. Although less than one-third (71/251, 28.3%) had to participate in regular performance testing, the vast majority (190/251, 75.7%) agreed that a mandatory test would be helpful to improve their skills.
Conclusion
QA measures were in place for more than half of the respondents working in screening and diagnostic mammography to evaluate their breast imaging performance. Although there were substantial differences between countries, the importance of having QA in the workplace and implemented was widely acknowledged by radiologists.
Clinical relevance statement
Although several quality assurance (QA) measures of image interpretation are recommended by European bodies or national organisations, the QA in mammography is quite heterogenous between countries and reporting settings, and not always actively implemented across Europe.
Key Points
The first survey that presents radiologists’ preferences regarding QA measures of image interpretation in mammography.
Quality assurance measures in the workplace are better-established for breast screening compared to diagnostic mammography.
Radiologists consider that performance tests would help to improve their mammography interpretation skills.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference26 articles.
1. European Commission (2020) Breast cancer burden in EU-27. European Commission, European Cancer Information System. Available via https://ecis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pdf/Breast_cancer_factsheet-Dec_2020.pdf. Accessed 8 Sept 2022
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021) Breast cancer – what is breast screening? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Available via https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/basic_info/screening.htm. Accessed 8 Sept 2022
3. Zielonke N, Kregting LM, Heijnsdijk EAM et al (2020) The potential of breast cancer screening in Europe. Int J Cancer 148(2):406–418
4. European Commission (2022) European guidelines on breast cancer screening and diagnosis. European Commission, European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer. Available via https://healthcare-quality.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ecibc/european-breast-cancer-guidelines. Accessed 8 Sept 2022
5. European Commission (2022) European Health Union: Commission welcomes adoption of new EU cancer screening recommendations, European Commission Press release. Available via https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_7548
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献