Author:
Toms Andoni P.,Rifai Tamam,Whitehouse Celia,McNamara Iain
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Rotational malalignment of knee replacements as measured on CT is understood to be associated with poor outcomes. The aim of this study is to measure the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of measures of femoral and tibial version in the native arthritic knee and postoperative TKR component position using CT.
Methods
Eighty patients underwent CT of the knee before and after total knee replacement. Preoperative femoral and tibial version and component rotation were independently measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists.
Results
Mean differences between and within raters were small (< 1.6°). Maximum 95% limits of agreement for inter-rater and intra-rater comparisons were 8.1° and 7.6° for preoperative femoral version, 9.0° and 7.9° for postoperative femoral rotation, 26.0° and 20.5° for preoperative tibial version, and 24.9° and 23.6° for postoperative tibial rotation respectively. Postoperative ICCs varied from 0.68 to 0.81 (lower 95% CI:0.55–0.72) for both intra- and inter-rater comparisons. Preoperative ICCs were lower: 0.55–0.75 (lower 95% CI:0.40–0.65).
Conclusion
The lower 95% confidence level for ICC of version and rotational measurements using the Berger protocol of TKRs on CT are all less than 0.73 and that the normal range of differences between observers is up to 9° for the femoral component and 26° for the tibial component. This suggests that CT measurements derived from the Berger protocol may not be consistent enough for clinical practice.
Key Points
• CT is commonly used to measure the rotational profile of knee replacements in symptomatic patients using the Berger protocol.
• The limits of agreement for both femoral and tibial component rotation are wide even for experienced observers.
• CT measurements of the rotation of knee arthroplasty are not reliable enough for routine clinical use.
Funder
gwen fish orthopaedic research trust
smith and nephew orthopaedics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM et al (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9
2. Planckaert C, Larose G, Ranger P et al (2018) Total knee arthroplasty with unexplained pain: new insights from kinematics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:553–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2873-5
3. Panni AS, Ascione F, Rossini M et al (2018) Tibial internal rotation negatively affects clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1636–1644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4823-0
4. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199811000-00021
5. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R et al (2001) Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg 14:152–156
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献