Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To assess the predictive value and correlation to pathological progression of the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system in the follow-up of prostate cancer (PCa) patients on active surveillance (AS).
Methods
A total of 295 men enrolled on an AS programme between 2011 and 2018 were included. Baseline multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was performed at AS entry to guide biopsy. The follow-up mpMRI studies were prospectively reported by two sub-specialist uroradiologists with 10 years and 13 years of experience. PRECISE scores were dichotomized at the cut-off value of 4, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Diagnostic performance was further quantified by using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) which was based on the results of targeted MRI-US fusion biopsy. Univariate analysis using Cox regression was performed to assess which baseline clinical and mpMRI parameters were related to disease progression on AS.
Results
Progression rate of the cohort was 13.9% (41/295) over a median follow-up of 52 months. With a cut-off value of category ≥ 4, the PRECISE scoring system showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for predicting progression on AS of 0.76, 0.89, 0.52 and 0.96, respectively. The AUC was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.74–0.90). Prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D), Likert lesion score and index lesion size were the only significant baseline predictors of progression (each p < 0.05).
Conclusion
The PRECISE scoring system showed good overall performance, and the high NPV may help limit the number of follow-up biopsies required in patients on AS.
Key Points
• PRECISE scores 1–3 have high NPV which could reduce the need for re-biopsy during active surveillance.
• PRECISE scores 4–5 have moderate PPV and should trigger either close monitoring or re-biopsy.
• Three baseline predictors (PSA density, lesion size and Likert score) have a significant impact on the progression-free survival (PFS) time.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference35 articles.
1. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al (2018) EAU-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer 2018. In: European Association of Urology guidelines. 2018 Edition. European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem
2. Chen RC, Rumble RB, Loblaw DA et al (2016) Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer (Cancer Care Ontario guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement. J Clin Oncol 34:2182–2190. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7759
3. Briganti A, Fossati N, Catto JWF et al (2018) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: the European Association of Urology position in 2018. Eur Urol 74:357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.008
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management, clinical guideline [CG175], 2014. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg175/chapter/1-recommendations. Accessed 26 Mar 2019
5. Sushentsev N, Caglic I, Sala E et al (2020) The effect of capped active surveillance biparametric magnetic resonance imaging slots on weekly prostate cancer imaging workload. Br J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190929
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献