Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center

Author:

Opper Hernando Maria IsabelORCID,Witham Denis,Steinhagen Peter Richard,Angermair Stefan,Bauer Wolfgang,Compton Friederike,Edel Andreas,Kruse Jan,Kühnle York,Lachmann Gunnar,Marz Susanne,Müller-Redetzky Holger,Nee Jens,Paul Oliver,Praeger Damaris,Skurk Carsten,Stegemann Miriam,Uhrig Alexander,Wolf Stefan,Zimmermann Elke,Rubarth Kerstin,Bolanaki Myrto,Seybold Joachim,Dewey Marc,Pohlan Julian

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study aims to describe physicians’ perspectives on the use of computed tomography (CT) in patients with sepsis. Methods In January 2022, physicians of a large European university medical center were surveyed using a web-based questionnaire asking about their views on the role of CT in sepsis. A total of 371 questionnaires met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using work experience, workplace, and medical specialty of physicians as variables. Chi-square tests were performed. Results Physicians considered the ability to detect an unknown focus as the greatest benefit of CT scans in sepsis (70.9%, = 263/371). Two clinical criteria — “signs of decreased vigilance” (89.2%, = 331/371) and “increased catecholamine demand” (84.7%, = 314/371) — were considered highly relevant for a CT request. Elevated procalcitonin (82.7%, = 307/371) and lactate levels (83.6%, = 310/371) were consistently found to be critical laboratory values to request a CT. As long as there is evidence of infection in one organ region, most physicians (42.6%, = 158/371) would order a CT scan based on clinical assessment. Combined examination of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was favored (34.8%, = 129/371) in cases without clinical clues of an infection source. A time window of ≥ 1–6 h was preferred for both CT examinations (53.9%, = 200/371) and CT-guided interventions (59.3%, = 220/371) in patients with sepsis. Conclusion Despite much consensus, there are significant differences in attitudes towards the use of CT in septic patients among physicians from different workplaces and medical specialties. Knowledge of these perspectives may improve patient management and interprofessional communication. Key Points Despite interdisciplinary consensus on the use of CT in sepsis, statistically significant differences in the responses are apparent among physicians from different workplaces and medical specialties. The detection of a previously unknown source of infection and the ability to plan interventions and/or surgery based on CT findings are considered key advantages of CT in septic patients. Timing of CT reflects the requirements of specific disciplines.

Funder

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3