Measuring welfare with the use of the MIMIC approach: evidence for Poland

Author:

Jewczak MaciejORCID,Korczak KarolORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe growing interest in the concept of using welfare categories as a measure of economic or social development results from the fact that dominant income categories have been replaced by solutions related to individuals’ basic, existential and higher-order needs being fulfilled. The transition from analysing the poverty rate category, through the various approaches to material deprivation, to the perception of welfare in economic, subjective, or hidden terms is visible. The main purpose of the study is to estimate the subjective level of welfare of households in Poland. The subjective level of various socio-economic phenomena is often difficult to estimate; therefore, the study uses the approach of structural modelling for the multiple indicators and multiple causes model (MIMIC), which assumes the presence of a latent variable. The research is based on data from the Social Diagnosis panel study for household level in Poland. Based on the construction and positive substantive and statistical verification of the model the results show that subjectively the best welfare situation was identified mainly for households located in countryside areas, where even the lowest estimated levels of welfare exceed the highest estimated levels for cities of various sizes. Investigating the spatial distribution, the highest levels of subjective welfare were recorded for the Lubelskie and Swietokrzyskie voivodeships, and thanks to moving to a higher spatial data aggregation level (to the sub-regional), a more detailed assessment of spatial units was possible. In further research, individualised voivodeship models will be estimated to capture a more accurate differentiation of the influence of MIMIC model variables. A similar direction of analysis is anticipated for sub-regional data.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Geography, Planning and Development

Reference62 articles.

1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike (pp. 371–386). NewYork: Springer.

2. Akerele, D., & Adewuyi, S. A. (2011). Analysis of poverty profiles and socioeconomic determinants of welfare among urban households of Ekiti State, Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 1–7.

3. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.

4. Almenar, V., Sánchez, J. L., & Sapena, J. (2020). Measuring the shadow economy and its drivers: The case of peripheral EMU countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 2904–2918.

5. Arbache, J. S., Kolev, A., & Filipiak, E. (Eds.). (2010). Gender disparities in Africa’s labor market. The World Bank.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3