The concept of quality of life and its application using the World Value Survey Wave 7: Slovak experience

Author:

Murgaš František,Macků Karel,Grežo Henrich,Petrovič František

Abstract

AbstractThe paper is focused on the spatial differentiation of the quality of life at a district level, drawing data from the World Value Survey Round 7 (2017–2022). Spatial quality of life research in the traditional sense is based on the premise that quality of life is experienced by the individual in a physical geographical space, and therefore the research focuses on the objective, spatial dimension of quality of life, measured using the objective indicators, usually from statistical sources. The novelty of the paper lies in the premise that a spatial investigation of the subjective dimension of quality of life is also possible, focusing on the question of where people are satisfied with their lives. The indicator of this dimension is a self-related evaluation, obtained using the face-to-face method or the internet. In the case of the World Value Survey 7, data collection was done using the Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) technique. The aim of the paper is to conceptualize the subjective dimension of quality of life, apply the concept using data from WVS 7 and to find out which of the selected variables—also contained in WVS 7—are predictors of quality of life.

Funder

Agentúra Ministerstva Školstva, Vedy, Výskumu a Športu SR

Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Geography, Planning and Development

Reference47 articles.

1. Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life. Clarendon Press.

2. Anderson, K. L., & Burckhardt, C. S. (1999). Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life as an outcome variable for health care intervention and research. Journal of Advances Nursing, 29(2), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00889.x

3. Australian Centre on Quality of Life. (2017). What is quality of life? Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University. Online. Retrieved 19 May 202 from https://www.acqol.com.au/about

4. Aza, A., Verdugo, M. Á., Orgaz, M. B., Amor, A. M., & Fernández, M. (2021). Predictive factors of self-reported quality of life in acquired brain injury: One-year follow-up. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030927

5. Babinčák, P. (2013). Measurement of quality of life: Overview studies analysis in selected data-bases. ČEskoslovenská Psychologie., 57(4), 358–371.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3