De/colonizing OpenStreetMap? Local mappers, humanitarian and commercial actors and the changing modes of collaborative mapping

Author:

Schröder-Bergen SusanneORCID,Glasze Georg,Michel Boris,Dammann Finn

Abstract

AbstractIn its early days, the geodata and mapping project OpenStreetMap (OSM) was widely celebrated for opening up and “democratizing” the production of geographic knowledge. However, critical research highlights that the new socio-technical practices of collaborative mapping often also produce or reproduce patterns of exclusion, not least in the area of relative data density between the Global South and North. These findings notwithstanding, we consider it important to acknowledge the increasing number of contributions of geodata from regions outside the old European core of OSM. This expansion of geodata production in OSM is related to a diversification of OSM actors and socio-technical practices. While OSM has often been described as a crowd-based project bringing together thousands of individual craft mappers, our analysis of OSM metadata indicates new institutional actors are gaining relevance. These developments have not only resulted in new collaborations but also conflicts between local mapping communities and institutional actors. We interpret these processes in two ways. First, the expansion of mapping activities can be viewed as a decolonizing process, whereby quantitative differences in data density between the Global North and South are partly reduced and new groups of local mappers are empowered to produce geographic knowledge. Second, these new developments can also be understood as colonizing processes. The engagement of large commercial actors in OSM raises concerns that the project (and its local mappers) could be used as a new means of data extraction and that in particular new and diverse voices in the OSM community are marginalized by a fixation on economically exploitable, modernistic and universalistic epistemologies. However, this supposedly clear distinction should not obscure the fact that colonizing and decolonizing processes intertwine in complex ways.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Geography, Planning and Development

Reference79 articles.

1. Anderson, J. (2016). OpenStreetMap contribution analysis: A research collaboration with Mapbox. Retrieved Mar 12, 2021, from https://mapbox.github.io/osm-analysis-collab/

2. Anderson, J., Sarkar, D., & Palen, L. (2019). Corporate editors in the evolving landscape of OpenStreetMap. IJGI, 8(5), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8050232

3. Ballatore, A., & Sabbata, S. D. (2020). Los angeles as a digital place: The geographies of user-generated content. Transactions in GIS, 24(4), 880–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12600t

4. Barron, C., Neis, P., & Zipf, A. (2014). A comprehensive framework for intrinsic openstreetmap quality analysis. Transactions in GIS, 18(6), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12073

5. Bellone, T., Engel-Di Mauro, S., Fiermonte, F., Armano, E., & Quiquivix, L. (2020). Mapping as tacit representations of the colonial gaze. In D. Specht (Ed.), Mapping crisis: Participation, datafication and humanitarianism in the age of digital mapping (pp. 17–38). University of London Press.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3