Abstract
Abstract
Borges’ The Circular Ruins tells the story of a magician who turns out to be a character in a dream. Leibowitz (2021) argues that this scenario undermines the rational indubitability of Descartes’ Cogito. The magician, he argues, is an unreal appearance and therefore does not exist. I argue that Borges drew a distinction between reality and existence and that he was right to do so. There are various senses of reality and the sense in which a dreamt character is unreal poses no threat to their existence or to the indubitability of the Cogito. The magician is unreal because he is a mind-dependent, illusory and fake. Nonetheless, he can be certain that he thinks, therefore he is.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference11 articles.
1. Billon, A. (2015). Why are we certain that we exist? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91(3), 723–759.
2. Cabanchik, S. M. (2017). Sueño y existencia: El cogito cartesiano en Las ruinas circulares de JL Borges. Hybris: Revista de filosofía, 8(1), 241–252.
3. Chalmers, D. J. (2022). Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. Allen Lane.
4. Crane, T. (2013). The Objects of Thought. Oxford University Press.
5. Descartes, R. (1984–5). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volumes I & II (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch Eds.). Cambridge University Press.