Abstract
AbstractDispositional essentialism is the view that all or many fundamental properties are essentially dispositional, or powers. The literature on the dispositional essence of powers is abundant. In contrast, the question of how to understand the fundamentality of fundamental powers has received scarce interest. Therefore, the fundamentality of powers stands in need of clarification. There are four main conceptions of the fundamental, namely as that which is (i) metaphysically independent; or (ii) belonging to a minimally complete basis; or (iii) perfectly natural; or (iv) metaphysically primitive. Here, I present and discuss each of these approaches from the viewpoint of dispositional essentialism. I show that (i) is incompatible with the metaphysics of powers and (ii)–(iv) have more drawbacks than merits. Therefore, my conclusion is that the dispositional essentialist should seek an alternative. Although I offer no positive account, I pave the way to more fruitful views by identifying the shortcoming of these unpromising options.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Barker, S. (2013). The Emperor’s new metaphysics of powers. Mind, 122, 605–653
2. Barnes, E. (2012). Emergence and fundamentality. Mind, 121, 873–901
3. Bauer, W. A. (2011). An argument for the extrinsic grounding of mass. Erkenntnis, 74, 81–99
4. Bauer, W. A. (2013). Dispositional essentialism and the nature of powerful properties. Disputatio, 35, 1–19
5. Bird, A. (2007). Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Carving Up the Network of Powers;Powers, Parts and Wholes;2023-07-10