Abstract
AbstractThe great eleventh-century figure, Rāmānuja, belonged to the Śrīvaiṣṇava community that worshiped the divine as Viṣṇu-with-Śrī, the Lord-and-Consort. But he also embarked on a project to develop an interpretation of the first-century Vedāntasūtra, which presented the supposedly core teachings of the major Upaniṣads, traditionally the last segment of the sacred corpus of the Vedas. Rāmānuja sought to reconcile the devotional commitments of Śrīvaiṣṇavism—which was built on the human yearning for the divine that was incomprehensibly Other while graciously accessible—with the conceptual demands of the Vedānta in which a profound identity between the individual self (ātman) and the impersonal, ultimate explanatory principle (brahman) was taught. This reconciliation of difference and identity came to be called “Qualified Nondualism.” In his earliest work, the Vedārthasaṃgraha, one of the ways Rāmānuja points to reconciliation is through identifying a single state of consciousness as both cognition of nonduality (the Vedāntic project) and the emotionally valent experience of happiness (the supreme expression of the human encounter with the divine). It does not seem that he systematically pursues this conception of how a state can be both cognitive and affective, and such an analysis will require independent philosophical analysis. Thus, this article argues that if a state of consciousness were indeed both cognitive and affective in this way, we would have a full explanation for how the devotional approach of a human being to Viṣṇu-with-Śrī can also be the self’s realization of identity with brahman.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Religious studies,Cultural Studies
Reference13 articles.
1. Swāmī Ādidevānanda. 1956. “Foreword.” In S. S. Raghavachar, trans., Vedārthasaṁgraha of Śrī Rāmānujācārya, i–x. Mysore: Sri Ramakrishna Ashram.
2. Barua, Ankur. 2009. The Divine Body in History: A Comparative Study of Time and Embodiment in the Theologies of St Augustine and Rāmānuja. New York: Peter Lang.
3. Betty, Stafford. 2010. “Dvaita, Advaita and Viśiṣṭādvaita: Contrasting Views of Mokṣa.” Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of the Philosophical Traditions of the East 20, 2: 215–24.
4. van Buitenen, J. A. B. 1966. “On the Archaism of the Bhāgavata Purāṇa.” In Milton Singer, ed., Krishna: Myths, Rites, and Attitudes, 23–40 (article), 215–17 (notes). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
5. Carman, John Braisted. 1974. The Theology of Rāmānuja. An Essay in Interreligious Understanding. New Haven: Yale University Press
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献