Abstract
AbstractFamily-based therapy is a common front-line strategy to prevent child maltreatment in high-risk families. This review aimed to systematically assess the evidence of the effect of family-based therapy programs on child maltreatment outcomes. CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO were systematically searched to March 25, 2023. Outcome data were extracted for child protection reports and out-of-home care (OOHC) placements from administrative data, and parent- or child-reported maltreatment risk. 12 RCTs and two observational studies of 8,410 screened were included. All 14 studies had high risk of bias. Sample sizes ranged from 43 in an RCT to 3875 families in an observational study. In seven studies with child protection report risk estimates, five studies (3 RCTs, 2 observational) showed results in favor of the intervention (risk differences (RD) of 2.0–41.1 percentage points) and two RCTs in favor of the comparison (RD, 2.0–8.6 percentage points). In the four studies with OOHC risk estimates, three studies (2 RCTs, 1 observational) showed results in favor of the intervention (RD, 0.9–17.4 percentage points) and one observational study showed results in favor of the comparison (RD, 1.5 percentage points). Most studies had ≤ 100 participants, did not estimate main causal effects, and had high risk of bias. Thus, although family-based therapy programs may reduce child maltreatment, the high risk of bias, typically small sample sizes (> 62% of studies had sample sizes < 100), and inconsistent results across studies means it is currently unclear whether family-based therapy interventions achieve better child maltreatment outcomes, compared with usual care services.
Funder
University of New South Wales
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
National Health and Medical Research Centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,History,Education
Reference59 articles.
1. Alexander, J. F., & Robbins, M. S. (2011). Clinical handbook of assessing and treating conduct problems in youth. Springer.
2. Alternative for Families: A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (n.d.). History of the Model. http://www.afcbt.org/EvidenceBase/HistoryoftheModel
3. Australia Productivity Commission. (2018). Report on Government services 2018. https://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2018
4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2021). Child protection Australia 2019-2020. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/c3b0e267-bd63-4b91-9ea6-9fa4d14c688c/aihw-cws-78.pdf.aspx?inline=true
5. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2015). Best (but oft forgotten) practices: Testing for treatment effects in randomized trials by separate analyses of changes from baseline in each group is a misleading approach. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 102(5), 991–994.