Abstract
AbstractThe prediction of crack initiation and propagation in ductile failure processes are challenging tasks for the design and fabrication of metallic materials and structures on a large scale. Numerical aspects of ductile failure dictate a sub-optimal calibration of plasticity- and fracture-related parameters for a large number of material properties. These parameters enter the system of partial differential equations as a forward model. Thus, an accurate estimation of the material parameters enables the precise determination of the material response in different stages, particularly for the post-yielding regime, where crack initiation and propagation take place. In this work, we develop a Bayesian inversion framework for ductile fracture to provide accurate knowledge regarding the effective mechanical parameters. To this end, synthetic and experimental observations are used to estimate the posterior density of the unknowns. To model the ductile failure behavior of solid materials, we rely on the phase-field approach to fracture, for which we present a unified formulation that allows recovering different models on a variational basis. In the variational framework, incremental minimization principles for a class of gradient-type dissipative materials are used to derive the governing equations. The overall formulation is revisited and extended to the case of anisotropic ductile fracture. Three different models are subsequently recovered by certain choices of parameters and constitutive functions, which are later assessed through Bayesian inversion techniques. A step-wise Bayesian inversion method is proposed to determine the posterior density of the material unknowns for a ductile phase-field fracture process. To estimate the posterior density function of ductile material parameters, three common Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques are employed: (i) the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm, (ii) delayed-rejection adaptive Metropolis, and (iii) ensemble Kalman filter combined with MCMC. To examine the computational efficiency of the MCMC methods, we employ the $$\hat{R}{-}convergence$$
R
^
-
c
o
n
v
e
r
g
e
n
c
e
tool. The resulting framework is algorithmically described in detail and substantiated with numerical examples.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computational Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Mechanical Engineering,Ocean Engineering,Computational Mechanics
Reference123 articles.
1. Miehe C (2011) A multi-field incremental variational framework for gradient-extended standard dissipative solids. J Mech Phys Solids 59(4):898–923
2. Miehe C, Aldakheel F, Mauthe S (2013) Mixed variational principles and robust finite element implementations of gradient plasticity at small strains. Int J Numer Meth Eng 94(11):1037–1074
3. Peerlings RH, de Borst R, Brekelmans W, Geers MG (1998) Gradient-enhanced damage modelling of concrete fracture. Mech Cohesive-frictional Mater Int J Exp Modell Comput Mater Struct 3(4):323–342
4. Kiefer B, Waffenschmidt T, Sprave L, Menzel A (2018) A gradient-enhanced damage model coupled to plasticity-multi-surface formulation and algorithmic concepts. Int J Damage Mech 27(2):253–295
5. Junker P, Riesselmann J, Balzani D (2021) Efficient and robust numerical treatment of a gradient-enhanced damage model at large deformations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.08819
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献