Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study

Author:

Ruffolo MaryORCID,Price Daicia,Schoultz Mariyana,Leung Janni,Bonsaksen Tore,Thygesen Hilde,Geirdal Amy Østertun

Abstract

Abstract Background Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in changes in the work environment and employment uncertainty. This paper reports on a cross-national comparison of four countries (Norway, UK, USA and Australia) and examines the differences in mental health between those individuals employed and those not employed during the social distancing implementation. Methods Participants (N = 3,810) were recruited through social media in April/May 2020 and were invited to complete a self-administered electronic survey over a 3-week period. Differences between those employed and those not employed with regard to their sociodemographic characteristics and mental health were investigated with chi-square tests, independent t tests, and one-way analysis of variances (ANOVAs). Results Compared with their counterparts, participants who were employed reported lower levels of mental health distress (p < 0.001), higher levels of psychosocial well-being (p < 0.001), better overall quality of life (p < 0.001), and lower levels of overall loneliness, social loneliness, and emotional loneliness (p < 0.001). Small to medium but consistent differences (Cohen’s d = 0.23–0.67) in mental health favor those with employment or those who were retired. Conclusion Further study is needed to assess mental health over time as the COVID-19 pandemic and employment uncertainty continues.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference21 articles.

1. Aalto, A. M., Elovainio, M., Kivimäki, M., Uutela, A., & Pirkola, S. (2012). The Beck Depression Inventory and General Health Questionnaire as measures of depression in the general population: a validation study using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview as the gold standard. Psychiatry Research, 197(1–2), 163–171.

2. Adlaf, E. M., Gliksman, L., Demers, A., & Newton-Taylor, B. (2001). The prevalence of elevatedpsychological distress among Canadian undergraduates: findings from the 1998 Canadian Campus Survey. Journal of American College Health, 50(2), 6p. Retrieved from http://content.epnet.com/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=5346826&EbscoContent=dGJyMNLr40SeprY4y9f3OLCmr0qeprFSsaa4Sa%2BWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMO3p6ofh5eqEuePfgeyx%2BEu3q64A&D=aph.

3. Atkinsen, T. (1982). The stability and validity of quality of life measures. Social Science and Medicine, 10, 113–132.

4. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

5. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3