Author:
Lee Lian,Greenway Kathleen,Schutz Sue
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Communication in surgery is integral to the fundamentals of perioperative nursing practice and
patient safety. Research exploring team communication in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is evident in the literature
but little attention has been focused on how the experiences of operating room nurses' communication affect safety,
practice and patient care outcomes.
Objective
To synthesise current evidence regarding communication during robotic-assisted surgery as
experienced by registered nurses.
Design
An integrative literature review informed by Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) methodology was used to
conduct a rigorous analysis and synthesis of evidence.
Methods
A comprehensive database search was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. CINAHL, Pubmed,
PsychINFO and British Nursing Web of Science databases were searched using a Boolean strategy.
Results
Twenty-five relevant papers were included in this literature review. Thematic analysis revealed two main
themes with four related subthemes. The two main themes are: ‘Adaptive operating room nursing in RAS’ and ‘RAS
alters team dynamics’. The four subthemes are: ‘Navigating disruptions in RAS’, ‘RAS heightens interdependence
on team working’, ‘Augmented communicative workflow in RAS’, and ‘Professional empowerment to speak up’.
Conclusions
This integrative review identifies how current research largely focuses on communication in the
wider OR team. However, current evidence lacks the input of nurses. Therefore, further evidence is needed to
explore nurses' experiences to highlight their perspectives.
Clinical Relevance
Robotics significantly benefit patients, and this review identifies different challenges that
robotic-assisted surgery nurses encounter. A better understanding of the communication from the perspective of
nurses is needed to guide future research, practice education, policy development and leadership/management.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. AHBI (2022) White paper: robotic-assisted surgery and new models of surgical care. Available at: https://www.abhi.org.uk/media/3450/ras-white-paper.pdf (Accessed on 02/11/2022)
2. Andras I, Mazzone E, van Leeuwen FWB, De Naeyer G, van Oosterom MN, Beato S, Buckle T, O’Sullivan S, van Leeuwen PJ, Beulens A, Crisan N, D’Hondt F, Schatteman P, van Der Poel H, Dell’Oglio P, Mottrie A (2020) Artificial intelligence and robotics: a combination that is changing the operating room. World J Urol 38(10):2359–2366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03037-6
3. AORN (2021) Perioperative nursing: scope and standard or practice. AORN, Inc. https://www.aorn.org/docs/default-source/guidelines-resources/periop-nursing-scope-standards-of-practice.pdf?sfvrsn=c532cdee_1 (Accessed on 02/10/2023)
4. Almeras C, Almeras C (2019) Operating room communication in robotic surgery: place, modalities and evolution of a safe system of interaction. J Visc Surg 156(5):397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.02.004
5. Allers JC, Hussein AA, Ahmad N, Cavuoto L, Wing JF, Hayes RM, Guru KA (2016) Evaluation and impact of workflow interruptions during robot-assisted surgery. Urology 92:33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.040
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献