Is age an independent risk factor for medical complications following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy? An evaluation of contemporary American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) data-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Is age an independent risk factor for medical complications following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy? An evaluation of contemporary American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) data

Published:2016-06-04 Issue:4 Volume:10 Page:343-346
ISSN:1863-2483
Container-title:Journal of Robotic Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:J Robotic Surg

Author:

Dagrosa Lawrence M.,Ingimarsson Johann P.,Gorlov Ivan P.,Higgins John H.,Hyams Elias S.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Surgery

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11701-016-0605-9.pdf

Reference9 articles.

1. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Rogers CG, Peabody JO, Montorsi F, Menon M, Karakiewicz PI (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 61(4):679–685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027

2. Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Aronson WJ, Fox S, Gingrich JR, Wei JT, Gilhooly P, Grob BM, Nsouli I, Iyer P, Cartagena R, Snider G, Roehrborn C, R Sharifi, Blank W, Pandya P, Andriole GL, Culkin D, Wheeler T, Prostate Cancer Intervention versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) Study Group (2012) Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 367(3):203–213. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162

3. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, Garmo H, Stark JR, Busch C, Nordling S, Häggman M, Andersson SO, Bratell S, Spångberg A, Palmgren J, Steineck G, Adami HO, Johansson JE, SPCG-4 Investigators (2011) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364(18):1708–1717. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011967

4. Froehner M, Novotny V, Koch R, Leike S, Twelker L, Wirth MP (2013) Perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy: open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Urol Int 90(3):312–315. doi: 10.1159/000345323

5. Liu JJ, Maxwell BG, Panousis P, Chung BI (2013) Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) database. Urology 82(3):579–583. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.080

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Epidemiology of and Risk Factors in Postoperative Complications from Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Contemporary National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data;Journal of Endourology;2024-02-27

2. Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Pulmonary Disease Increase the Risk of Short-Term Major Postoperative Complications after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy;Medicina;2024-01-18

3. Patient Safety and Quality Improvement in Minimally Invasive Surgery;Journal of Endourology;2023-11-11

4. Surgical and medical co-management optimizes surgical outcomes in older patients with chronic diseases undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy;The Aging Male;2023-03-28

5. Functional outcomes rather than complications predict poor health-related quality of life at 6 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy;Journal of Robotic Surgery;2021-06-12