Author:
Chahal Baldev,Aydın Abdullatif,Amin Mohammad S. Ali,Ong Kelly,Khan Azhar,Khan Muhammad Shamim,Ahmed Kamran,Dasgupta Prokar
Abstract
AbstractDue to its advantages over open surgery and conventional laparoscopy, uptake of robot-assisted surgery has rapidly increased. It is important to know whether the existing open or laparoscopic skills of robotic novices shorten the robotic surgery learning curve, potentially reducing the amount of training required. This systematic review aims to assess psychomotor skill transfer to the robot in clinical and simulated settings. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were systematically searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines from inception to August 2021 alongside website searching and citation chaining. Article screening, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken by two independent reviewers. Outcomes included simulator performance metrics or in the case of clinical studies, peri- and post-operative metrics. Twenty-nine studies met the eligibility criteria. All studies were judged to be at high or moderate overall risk of bias. Results were narratively synthesised due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures. Two of the three studies assessing open surgical skill transfer found evidence of successful skill transfer while nine of twenty-seven studies evaluating laparoscopic skill transfer found no evidence. Skill transfer from both modalities is most apparent when advanced robotic tasks are performed in the initial phase of the learning curve but quality and methodological limitations of the existing literature prevent definitive conclusions. The impact of incorporating laparoscopic simulation into robotic training curricula and on the cost effectiveness of training should be investigated.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Surgery
Reference50 articles.
1. Lam K, Clarke J, Purkayastha S, Kinross JM (2021) Uptake and accessibility of surgical robotics in England. Int J Med Rob Comput Assist Surg 17(1):e2174
2. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21
3. Cao L, Yang Z, Qi L, Chen M (2019) Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: a Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(22):e15770
4. Skupin PA, Stoffel JT, Malaeb BS, Barboglio-Romo P, Ambani SN (2020) Robotic versus open ureteroneocystostomy: is there a robotic benefit? J Endourol 34(10):1028–1032
5. Brook N, Dell’Oglio P, Barod R, Collins J, Mottrie A (2019) Comprehensive training in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol 29(1):1–9
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献