3D Da Vinci robotic surgery: is it a risk to the surgeon’s eye health?

Author:

Molle Fernando,Savastano Maria Cristina,Giannuzzi Federico,Fossataro Claudia,Brando Davide,Molle Andrea,Rebecchi Maria Teresa,Falsini Benedetto,Mattei Roberta,Mirisola Giorgia,Poretti Eleonora,Cestrone Valentina,D’Agostino Elena,Bassi Pierfrancesco,Scambia Giovanni,Rizzo Stanislao

Abstract

AbstractDa Vinci three-dimensional (3D) system has been increasingly used in customary surgical settings, gaining fundamental relevance for abdominal, urological, and gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this research is to evaluate the degree of discomfort and potential changes in the binocular vision and ocular motility of surgical operators, who employ 3D vision systems during Da Vinci robotic surgery. Twenty-four surgeons were enrolled in the study, including twelve who typically use the 3D Da Vinci system and twelve who routinely employ 2D system. Routine general ophthalmological and orthoptic examinations were conducted at baseline (T0), the day before surgery, and 30 min after the 3D or 2D surgery (T1). In addition, surgeons were interviewed using a questionnaire of 18 symptoms, with each item containing three questions regarding the frequency, severity, and bothersomeness of the symptoms, in order to evaluate the degree of discomfort. Mean age at evaluation was 45.28 ± 8.71 years (range 33–63 years). Cover test, uncover test, and fusional amplitude showed no statistically significant difference. After surgery, no statistical difference was observed in the Da Vinci group on the TNO stereotest (p > 0.9999). However, the difference in the 2D group resulted statistically significant (p = 0.0156). Comparing participants (p 0.0001) and time (T0–T1; p = 0.0137), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Surgeons using 2D systems reported more discomfort than those using 3D systems. The absence of short-term consequences following surgery with the Da Vinci 3D system is a promising conclusion, considering the numerous advantages of this technology. Nonetheless, multicenter investigations and more studies are required to verify and interpret our findings.

Funder

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Surgery

Reference25 articles.

1. Bagolini B, Molle F, Turbati M, Lepore D, Scullica L (1995) Ocular motility of 72.000 vdu operators. In: Anzai Y, Ogawa K, Mori H (eds) Advances in human factors/ergonomics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 607–609

2. Peli E (1998) The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Res 38:2053–2066

3. Howarth PA (2011) Potential hazards of viewing 3-D stereoscopic television, cinema and computer games: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31:111–122

4. Aznar-Casanova JA, Romeo A, Gómez AT, Enrile PM (2017) Visual fatigue while watching 3D stimuli from different positions. J Optom 10:149–160

5. Han YG, Song T, Kang H, Kang DY, Oh TY (2020) Incidence and severity of visually induced motion sickness during 3D laparoscopy in operators who had no experience with it (VISION). Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 15:283–289

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3