Interdependence and Cultural Resources to Mediate Change: What Was Missing in Engeström’s Third Generational Activity Theory

Author:

von Fircks EnnoORCID

Abstract

Abstract In the present paper, I praise the benefits of organizational activity theory by means of an empirical example. I draw here on my work experience within a pharmacy. A client enters the pharmacy and demands medication for skin issues. The pharmacist wanting to prescribe a standard ointment refrains suddenly from this standard treatment while asking for the specific nature of the problem. The client lifting up his shirt lets him glimpse into his very intimate action field (body) which is the basis for an innovative solution – contacting a befriended dermatologist. The client entering the pharmacy is thus – equally – entering the complex interlocked action sphere of the pharmacist that can be made fertile for specific goals and purposes. Activity theory was able to decipher this complex human interaction while showing innovative solutions on the side of the pharmacy. It is thus doing justice to the complexity of dynamic people moving in time. Yet, activity theory lacks concrete cultural mechanisms of change. Here, I appeal interested readers not to create a new generation of organizational activity theory but to complement the third generation of it. I argue that interdependence and jointly negotiated cultural resources can mediate sustainable change within an organizational system. Interdependence of goals is important for the dermatologist to join the pharmacist in an alternative treatment while client and pharmacist need to negotiate the concrete details of exchanging contacts, sending photos of the skin issues and transferring contact details. I argue that these mechanisms should be the beginning of a research program that pays attention to cultural mechanisms that mediate change within organizational activity theory. The time is ripe.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference28 articles.

1. Avis, J. (2007). Engeström’s version of activity theory: A conservative praxis? Journal of Education and Work, 20(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080701464459

2. Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910902846916

3. Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. New York, NY: Springer New York.

4. Boesch, E. E. (2002). Genese der subjektiven Kultur [Genesis of subjective culture]. In M. Hildebrand-Nilshon, C.-H. Kim, & D. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Kultur (in) der Psychologie: Über das Abenteuer des Kulturbegriffs in der psychologischen Theorienbildung (pp. 67–95). Heidelberg, Germany: Asanger.

5. Boesch, E. E. (2005). Von Kunst bis Terror: Über den Zwiespalt in der Kultur [From art to terror: On the cleavage of culture]. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3