Abstract
AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has impacted higher education (hereinafter “HE”) teaching and learning approaches globally since 2020. It has compelled a major shift from face-to-face to online delivery, affecting the ways HE teachers teach and communicate with students. In this paper, we explore an under-researched area, teachers’ ideological dilemmas surrounding online teaching and issues related to remote or technologically mediated communication adopted in three countries, China, Japan and the UK. Drawing on the theoretical and methodological framework of discursive psychology, we focus on the concepts called ideological dilemmas and the kaleidoscope of common sense in order to examine common sense views of HE teachers regarding online and onsite teaching as well as blended learning where these constitute ideological dilemmas. Taking an exploratory, small case study approach, we present a discourse analysis of interviews with HE teachers and reveal their ideological dilemmas over online teaching. We identify the patterns of shifting justifications in the interviews. Our discussion highlights the dynamic and dilemmatic nature of the HE teachers’ views, some of which are shaped by the local university context, as well as the different ways in which the spread of COVID-19 is taking place and the various measures taken by each country’s government against the damaging effects of the pandemic.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference58 articles.
1. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
3. Bachmann, B. (2021). What is ‘new’ about disruption? Global Focus: The EFMD Business Magazine, 15(1), 1–7. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=148893583&site=ehost-live. Accessed 1 December 2021.
4. Billig, M. (1988). Common-places of the British royal family: A rhetorical analysis of plain and argumentative sense. Text, 8(3), 191–217.
5. Billig, M. (1989). The argumentative nature of holding strong views: A case study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420190303
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献