Teachers’ Ideological Dilemmas During the Pandemic at Higher Education Institutions: a Discursive Psychological Approach

Author:

Murakami KyokoORCID,Kondo Sachihiko,Hong Jianzhong

Abstract

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has impacted higher education (hereinafter “HE”) teaching and learning approaches globally since 2020. It has compelled a major shift from face-to-face to online delivery, affecting the ways HE teachers teach and communicate with students. In this paper, we explore an under-researched area, teachers’ ideological dilemmas surrounding online teaching and issues related to remote or technologically mediated communication adopted in three countries, China, Japan and the UK. Drawing on the theoretical and methodological framework of discursive psychology, we focus on the concepts called ideological dilemmas and the kaleidoscope of common sense in order to examine common sense views of HE teachers regarding online and onsite teaching as well as blended learning where these constitute ideological dilemmas. Taking an exploratory, small case study approach, we present a discourse analysis of interviews with HE teachers and reveal their ideological dilemmas over online teaching. We identify the patterns of shifting justifications in the interviews. Our discussion highlights the dynamic and dilemmatic nature of the HE teachers’ views, some of which are shaped by the local university context, as well as the different ways in which the spread of COVID-19 is taking place and the various measures taken by each country’s government against the damaging effects of the pandemic.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference58 articles.

1. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.

2. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.

3. Bachmann, B. (2021). What is ‘new’ about disruption? Global Focus: The EFMD Business Magazine, 15(1), 1–7. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=148893583&site=ehost-live. Accessed 1 December 2021.

4. Billig, M. (1988). Common-places of the British royal family: A rhetorical analysis of plain and argumentative sense. Text, 8(3), 191–217.

5. Billig, M. (1989). The argumentative nature of holding strong views: A case study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420190303

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3