Exploring the Ecology: Beyond Cameron and Khanna

Author:

Kowalski PatriciaORCID,Taylor Annette KujawskiORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn reviewing the Cameron and Khanna project, we find much to be commended. The large diverse sample of researchers and the collection of widespread student misconceptions will help focus students and instructors in the introductory course on teaching and learning the science of psychology. The recommendations we make provide a guide for looking beyond student belief and recognizing factors potentially contributing to and supporting misconceptions. Because teaching psychological science in the introductory psychology course is challenging, it is likely that misconceptions result from misinterpretations of the evidence. Investigating how textbooks and instructors’ perceptions of claims perpetuate misconceptions would be an important contribution toward improving the teaching of psychology. Assessing student misconceptions about psychological science would document the prevalence of science misconceptions, would permit the investigation of change in knowledge and scientific attitudes with the introductory psychology course, and would provide a basis for studying links between misconceptions about psychology and misunderstanding (or lack of appreciation) of the very nature of science.

Funder

University of San Diego

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference65 articles.

1. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Yu, C. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research and Politics, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848554

2. American Psychological Association. (2021). APA Introductory Psychology Initiative (IPI) student learning outcomes for introductory psychology [Framework]. Retrieved September 1, 2023, from https://www.apa.org/about/policy/introductory-psychology-initiative-student-outcomes.pdf

3. American Psychological Association. (2023). APA Board of Educational Affairs Working Group to Review the APA Principles for Quality Undergraduate Education in Psychology. Principles for Quality Education in Psychology. Retrieved September 1, 2023, from https://www.apa.org/about/policy/principles-quality-undergraduate-education-psychology.pdf

4. Amsel, E., Baird, T., & Ashley, A. (2011). Misconceptions and conceptual change in undergraduate students’ understanding of psychology as a science. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2011.10.1.3

5. Bartels, J. M., & Griggs, R. A. (2019). Using new revelations about the Stanford prison experiment to address APA undergraduate psychology major learning outcomes. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(4), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000163

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3