Theorizing Research Ethics for the Study of Psychological Phenomena from Within Relational Everyday Life

Author:

Hilppö JaakkoORCID,Chimirri Niklas Alexander,Rajala Antti

Abstract

Abstract How to investigate psychologically relevant phenomena in the most ethical ways possible is an enduring question for researchers not only in psychology but also in adjacent fields that study human subjectivity. Once acknowledging that both researchers and the people whose lives they want to study are human beings acting in a common world, also inhabited by non-human beings, the relationship between researchers and participants touches upon fundamental questions not only about what it means to do research together, but also what it means to conduct life in this world together. This implies that questions regarding what counts as ethical conduct need to be accentuated and also profoundly re-drawn given the encompassing complexity of these relations. In this article, we will shortly review the theoretical foundations and associated problematics of the dominant view of the researcher-researched relationship in current psychological (and other) research ethics. We then present and discuss what we mean by a relational ethical position from within practice and for practice. We will also shortly introduce how the other contributions to this special section advance the theoretical debates on research ethics.

Funder

Kulttuurin ja Yhteiskunnan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference57 articles.

1. Allen, G., & Israel, M. (2018). Moving beyond regulatory compliance: building institutional support for ethical reflection in research. In R. Iphofen & M. Tolich (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics (pp. 453–462). London: Sage.

2. Andreotti, V. (2011). Actionable postcolonial theory in education. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

3. Austin, W. (2007). Relational ethics. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 748–749). London: Sage.

4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (1st ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

5. Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition & Instruction, 34(3), 173–193.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3