Abstract
AbstractThis paper examines the current empirical accounting research paradigm. We ask: In general, do the estimated regressions support the promoted narratives? We focus on a regression model’s main variable of interest and consider the extent to which it contributes to the explanation of the dependent variable. We replicate 10 recently published accounting studies, all of which rely on significant t-statistics, per conventional levels, to claim rejection of the null hypothesis. Our examination shows that in eight studies, the incremental explanatory power contributed by the main variable of interest is effectively zero. For the remaining two, the incremental contribution is at best marginal. These findings highlight the apparent overreliance on t-statistics as the primary evaluation metric. A closer examination of the data shows that the t-statistics produced reject the null hypothesis primarily due to a large number of observations (N). Empirical accounting studies often require N > 10,000 to reject the null hypothesis. To avoid the drawback of t-statistics’ connection with N, we consider the implications of using Standardized Regressions (SR). The magnitude of SR coefficients indicates variables’ relevance directly. Empirical analyses establish a strong correlation between a variable’s estimated SR coefficient magnitude and its incremental explanatory power, without reference to N or t-statistics.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Accounting
Reference44 articles.
1. Abadie, A. 2020. Statistical nonsignificance in empirical economics. American Economic Review: Insights 2 (2): 193–208.
2. Afifi, A.A., and V. Clarke. 1990. Computer aided multivariate analysis (2nd ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3. Andrews, I., and M. Kasy. 2019. Identification of and correction for publication Bias. American Economic Review 109 (8): 2766–2794.
4. Biddle, G.C., G.S. Seow, and A.F. Siegel. 1995. Relative versus incremental information content. Contemporary Accounting Research 12 (1): 1–23.
5. Black, B. S., H. Desai, K. Litvak, W. Yoo, and J. J. Yu. 2019. Pre-analysis plan for the reg sho reanalysis project. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3415529.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献