Author:
Heredia Roberto R.,López Belem G.,García Omar,Altamira Wualú A.,González Patricia G.
Reference59 articles.
1. Aaronson, D., & Ferres, S. (1984). The word-by-word reading paradigm: An experimental and theoretical approach. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 31–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition, 24, 477–492.
3. Bolger, P., & Zapata, G. (2011). Semantic categories and context in L2 vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 61(2), 614–646.
4. Carpenter, P. A. (1984). The influences of methodologies on psycholinguistic research: A regression to the Whorfian Hypothesis. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 3–11). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Cieślicka, A. B. (2013). Do nonnative language speakers chew the fat and spill the beans with different brain hemispheres? Investigating idiom decomposability with the divided visual field paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 475–503.