1. J. M. Jauch andE. L. Hill:Phys. Rev.,57, 641 (1940);Yu. N. Demkov:Vestnik Lenin. State Univ.,11, 127 (1953);G. Baker:Phys. Rev.,103, 1119 (1956);S. P. Alliluev:Žurn. Ėksp. Teor. Fiz.,6, 156 (1958);Yu. N. Demkov:Žurn. Ėksp. Teor. Fiz.,17, 1349 (1963);D. M. Fradkin:Am. Journ. Phys.,33, 207 (1965);F. Duimio andG. Zambotti:Nuovo Cimento,43 A, 1203 (1966);B. Vitale:Lecture Notes (Madras, 1966);B. Vitale:Lecture Notes: Latin-American School of Physics (Caracas, 1966).
2. D. M. Fradkin:Existence of the dynamical symmetries O 4 and SU2 for all classical central potential problems, Wayne State Univ. preprint, 1966.
3. N. Mukunda:Dynamical symmetries and classical mechanics, Syracuse preprint, 1966.
4. L. D. Landau andE. M. Lifshitz:Mechanics (London, 1960).
5. We want to notice that our generators (14) are formally much simpler than the ones given in (1), due to the fact that the transformation from (r i, pi) to (w i, Ii) is canonical.