The Influence of Diagnostic Labels on the Evaluation of Students: a Multilevel Meta-Analysis

Author:

Franz David J.ORCID,Richter TobiasORCID,Lenhard WolfgangORCID,Marx Peter,Stein RolandORCID,Ratz Christoph

Abstract

AbstractResearch suggests that children suffering from different types of disorders (learning disorders, behavioral disorders, or intellectual disabilities) are sometimes evaluated differently simply due to the presence of a diagnostic label. We conducted a multilevel meta-analysis of experimental studies (based on data from 8,295 participants and on 284 effects nested in 60 experiments) to examine the magnitude and robustness of such label effects and to explore the impact of potential moderators (type of evaluation, diagnostic category, expertise, student’s gender, and amount and type of information). We found a moderately negative overall label effect (Hedges’ g = −0.42), which was robust across several types of evaluation, different samples, and different diagnostic categories. There was no indication that expertise and the gender of the child moderated the effect. Presenting participants with only a label yielded the strongest negative effect of g = −1.26, suggesting that the effect was dependent on the amount of information being presented to participants. We conclude that labeling a child can exacerbate negative academic evaluations, behavioral evaluations, evaluations of personality, and overall assessments of the child. Further implications for theory and future research are discussed.

Funder

Human Dynamics Center of the Faculty of Human Sciences at the University of Würzburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference144 articles.

1. *Allday, R. A., Duhon, G. J., Blackburn-Ellis, S., & van Dycke, J. L. (2011). The biasing effects of labels on direct observation by preservice teachers. Teach Educ Spec Educ, 34(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406410380422

2. Allen, M. S., Robson, D. A., Martin, L. J., & Laborde, S. (2020). Systematic review and meta-analysis of self-serving attribution biases in the competitive context of organized sport. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 46(7), 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219893995

3. *Aloia, G. F. (1975). Effects of physical stigmata and labels on judgments of subnormality by preservice teachers. Ment. Retard, 13(6), 17–21.

4. *Aloia, G. F., & MacMillan, D. L. (1983). Influence of the EMR label on initial expectations of regular-classroom teachers. Am. J. Ment. Defic., 88(3), 255–262.

5. *Aloia, G. F., Maxwell, J. A., & Aloia, S. D. (1981). Influence of a child’s race and the EMR label on initial impressions of regular-classroom teachers. Am. J. Ment. Defic., 85(6), 619-623.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3